“Will the Real Semi-Speaker Please Stand Up?” Language Vitality, Semi-Speakers, and Problems of Enumeration in the Canadian North
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.591.T03Mots-clés :
semi-locuteurs, vitalité linguistique, énumération, langues en voie de disparition, revitalisation, Dene Tha, nord canadienneRésumé
Cet article reconsidère les catégories qui sont utilisées dans les tentatives de revitalisation de langues et critique certaines pratiques d'énumération employées par des activistes pour mesurer la vitalité et la mise en danger d'une langue. Me basant sur un travail ethnographique auprès des Dene Tha dans la communauté de Chateh dans le nord-ouest de l'Alberta au Canada, je soutiens que ces pratiques d'énumération sont souvent fondées sur des notions idéalisées de « qui doit compter comme un locuteur de langue en voie de disparition ». Ces méthodes standard de comptage ne reconnaissent pas les pratiques linguistiques hétérogènes des « semi-locuteurs », qui parlent la langue partiellement et constituent souvent la majorité des jeunes orateurs des communautés linguistiques menacées. Pour corriger cet impair, je propose de modifier les discours élaborés en termes de « langue en danger » par celui de « vitalité d'une langue », permettant aux « semi-locuteurs » d'être reconnus et comptabilisés comme orateurs valables de ces « langues en voie de disparition ».
Téléchargements
Références
‘Aha Pūnana Leo 2015 http://www.ahapunanaleo.org/ (accessed 25 March 2016)
Austin, Peter K., and Julia Sallabank, eds. 2011 The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511975981
Baldwin, Daryl, and Julie Olds 2007 Miami Indian Language and Cultural Research at Miami University. In Beyond Red Power: New Perspectives on American Indian Politics and Activism since 1900. Daniel M. Cobb and Loretta Fowler, eds. Pp. 280–290. Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press
Bourdieu, Pierre 1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Bourhis, R.Y. 2001 Reversing Language Shift in Quebec. In Can Threatened Languages Be Saved? Reversing Language Shift Revisited: A 21st Century Perspective. Joshua A. Fishman, ed. Pp. 101–141. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters
Council for Yukon Indians 1991 Voices of the Talking Circle. Yukon Aboriginal Languages Conference, Executive Council Office, Aboriginal Branch, Whitehorse, Yukon
Crystal, David 2002 Language Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871549
Crystal, David 2003 Endangered Languages: What Should We Do Now? In Language Documentation and Description, vol. 1. Peter K. Austin, ed. Pp. 18–34. London: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project
Dalby, Andrew 2003 Language in Danger: The Loss of Linguistic Diversity and the Threat to Our Future. New York: Columbia University Press
Dauenhauer, Nora Marks, and Richard Dauenhauer 1998 Technical, Emotional and Ideological Issues in Reversing Language Shift: Examples from Southeast Alaska. In Endangered Languages: Language Loss and Community Response. Lenore Grenoble and Lindsay Whaley, eds. Pp. 57–98. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139166959.004
Debenport, Erin 2011 As the Rez Turns: Anomalies within and beyond the Boundaries of a Pueblo Community. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 35(2):87–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.17953/aicr.35.2.e22v33412156010g
Dixon, Robert M.W. 1997 The Rise and Fall of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612060
Dorian, Nancy 1977 The Problem of the Semi-Speaker in Language Death. Linguistics 191:23–32
Dorian, Nancy 1994 Purism vs. Compromise in Language Revitalization and Language Revival. Language in Society 23(4):479–494. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500018169
Duchene, Alexandre, and Monica Heller, eds. 2007 Discourses of Endangerment: Interest and Ideology in the Defense of Languages. London: Bloomsbury Academic
Eastman, Janet 2012 SOU Professor Awakens “Sleeping Languages.” Mail Tribune, December. http://www.mailtribune.com/article/20121226/NEWS/212260320 (accessed 25 March 2016)
Eisenlohr, Patrick 2004 Language Revitalization and New Technologies; Cultures of Electronic Mediation and the Refiguring of Communities. Annual Review of Anthropology 33(1):21–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.33.070203.143900
England, Nora C. 2002 Commentary: Further Rhetorical Concerns. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12(2):141–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.141
Ethnologue 2014 Endangered Languages. In Languages of the World: Endangered Languages. https://www.ethnologue.com/browse/names (accessed January 2014)
Evans, Nicholas 2001 The Last Speaker Is Dead – Long Live the Last Speaker! In Linguistic Fieldwork. Paul Newman and Martha Ratliff, eds. Pp. 250–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810206.013
Field, Margaret C. 2009 Changing Navajo Language Ideologies and Changing Language Use. In Native American Language Ideologies: Beliefs, Practices, and Struggles in Indian Country. Paul V. Kroskrity and Margaret C. Field, eds. Pp. 31–47. Tucson: University of Arizona Press
FirstVoices 2013 http://www.firstvoices.com/en/apps (accessed 25 March 2016)
Fishman, Joshua 1991 Reversing Language Shift: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations of Assistance to Threatened Languages. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters
Garrett, Paul B. 2005 Language Contact and Contact Languages. In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Alessandro Duranti, ed. Pp. 46–72. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470996522.ch3
Goodfellow, Anne 2003 The Development of “New” Languages in Native American Communities. American Indian Culture and Research Journal 27(2):41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.17953/aicr.27.2.m6pv171636626544
Grinevald, Colette 2005 Speakers and Documentation of Endangered Languages. In Language Documentation and Description. P.K. Austin, ed. Pp. 52–72. London: School of Oriental and African Studies
Henne-Ochoa, Richard, and Richard Bauman 2015 Who Is Responsible for Saving the Language? Performing Generation in the Face of Language Shift. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25(2):128–149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jola.12083
Hill, Jane H. 2002 “Expert Rhetorics” in Advocacy for Endangered Languages: Who Is Listening and What Do They Hear? Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12(2):119–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2002.12.2.119
Hinton, Leanne 2003 Language Revitalization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 23:44–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190503000187
Hinton, Leanne, and Kenneth Hale, eds. 2001 The Green Book of Language Revitalization in Practice. New York: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004261723
Hornsby, David 2007 Dialect Lite? The Rise of the Semi-speaker in an Obsolescent Dialect Community. In The French Language and Questions of Identity. Wendy Ayres-Bennett and Mari C. Jones, eds. Pp. 76–88. Oxford: Legenda
Krauss, Michael 1992 The World's Languages in Crisis. Language 68(1):1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lan.1992.0075
Kroskrity, Paul V. 1998 Arizona Tewa Kiva Speech as a Manifestation of a Dominant Language Ideology. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity, eds. Pp. 103–122. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Leonard, Wesley Y. 2008 When Is an “Extinct Language” Not Extinct?: Miami, a Formerly Sleeping Language. In Sustaining Linguistic Diversity: Endangered and Minority Languages and Language Varieties. Kendall A. King, Natalie Schilling-Estes, Jia Jackie Lou, Lyn Fogle, and Barbara Soukup, eds. Pp. 23–33. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press
Lewis, M.P., ed. 2009 Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 16th ed. Dallas: Texas SIL International
Lewis, P.M., and G.F. Simons 2010 Assessing Endangerment: Expanding Fishman's Gids. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 55(2):103–120
Lo Bianco, J., and M. Rhydwen 2001 Is the Extinction of Australia's Indigenous Languages Inevitable? In Can Threatened Languages Be Saved? Reversing Language Shift Revisited: A 21st Century Perspective. Joshua A. Fishman, ed. Pp. 391–422. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters
Loether, Christopher 2009 Language Revitalization and the Manipulation of Language Ideologies: A Shoshoni Case Study. In Native American Language Ideologies: Beliefs, Practices, and Struggles in Indian Country. Paul V. Kroskrity and Margaret C. Field, eds. Pp. 3–31. Tucson: University of Arizona Press
Makoni, Sinfree, and Alastair Pennycook, eds. 2007 Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters
McCarty, Teresa L., Mary Eunice Romero, and Ofelia Zepeda 2006 Reclaiming the Gift: Indigenous Youth Counter-Narratives on Native Language Loss and Revitalization. American Indian Quarterly 30(1–2):28–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2006.0005
Meek, Barbra A. 2012 We Are Our Language: An Ethnography of Language Revitalization in a Northern Athabaskan Community. Tucson: University of Arizona Press
Meek, Barbra A. 2014 “She Can Do It in English Too”: Acts of Intimacy and Boundary-Making in Language Revitalization. Language and Communication 38:73–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.05.004
Michel, Kathryn A. 2005 You Can't Kill Coyote: Stories of Language Healing From Chief Atahm School Secwepemc Language Immersion Program. MA thesis, Faculty of Education, Simon Fraser University. http://summit.sfu.ca/item/5641 (accessed 25 March 2016)
Moore, Robert E. 2006 Disappearing, Inc.: Glimpsing the Sublime in the Politics of Access to Endangered Languages. Language and Communication 26(3-4):296–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2006.02.009
Moore, Robert E., Sari Pietikäinen, and Jan Blommaert 2010 Counting the Losses: Numbers as the Language of Language Endangerment. Sociolinguistic Studies 4(1):1–26
Muehlmann, Shaylih 2012 Von Humboldt's Parrot and the Countdown of Last Speakers in the Colorado Delta. Language and Communication 32(2):160–168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.05.001
Mufwene, Salikoko S. 2003 Language Endangerment: What Have Pride and Prestige Got to Do with It? In When Languages Collide: Perspectives on Language Conflict, Language Competition, and Language Coexistence. Brian D. Joseph, Johanna DeStefano, Neil G. Jacobs, and Ilse Lehiste, eds. Pp. 324–346. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press
Nettle, Daniel, and Suzanne Romaine 2002 Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World's Languages. New York: Oxford University Press
Nevins, Eleanor M. 2004 Learning to Listen: Confronting Two Meanings of Language Loss in the Contemporary White Mountain Apache Speech Community. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(2):269–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2004.14.2.269
Newman, Paul 2003 The Endangered Language Issue as a Hopeless Cause. In Language Death and Language Maintenance. Theoretical, Practical and Descriptive Approaches. Mark Janse and Sijmen Tol, eds. Pp. 1–13. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/cilt.240.03new
Perley, Bernard C. 2012 Zombie Linguistics: Experts, Endangered Languages and the Curse of Undead Voices. Anthropological Forum: A Journal of Social Anthropology and Comparative Sociology 22(2):133–149
Silverstein, Michael 1979 Language Structure and Linguistic Ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels. Paul R. Clyne, William F. Hanks, and Carol L. Hofbauer, eds. Pp. 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Simons, G.F., and P.M. Lewis 2013 The World's Languages in Crisis: A 20-Year Update. In Responses to Language Endangerment: In Honor of Mickey Noonan. New Directions in Language Documentation and Language Revitalization. Elena Mihas, Bernard Perley, Gabriel Rei-Doval, and Kathleen Wheatley, eds. Pp. 3–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/slcs.142.01sim
Thieberger, Nicholas 2002 Extinction in Whose Terms? Which Parts of a Language Constitute a Target for Language Maintenance Programmes? In Language Endangerment and Language Maintenance. David Bradley and Maya Bradley, eds. Pp. 310–328. London: Routledge Curzon
UN Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 2003 Language Vitality and Endangerment. Document submitted to the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages. Paris, 10–12 March 2003
Walsh, Michael 2005 Will Indigenous Languages Survive? Annual Review of Anthropology 34(1):293–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120629
Woolard, Katherine A. 1998. Language Ideology as a Field of Inquiry. In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Bambi B. Schieffelin, Kathryn A. Woolard, and Paul V. Kroskrity, eds. Pp. 3–50. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wyman, Leisy Thornton 2012 Youth Culture, Language Endangerment and Linguistic Survivance: Legal, Historical and Current Practices in SEI. Clevendon, UK: Multilingual Matters
Zuckermann, Ghil'ad 2009 Hybridity versus Revivability: Multiple Causation, Forms and Patterns. Journal of Language Contact: Evolution of Languages, Contact and Discourse 2(2):40–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/000000009792497788
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui collaborent avec Anthropologica consentent à publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution – Utilisation non commerciale 4.0 – International. Cette licence permet à quiconque de partager l’œuvre (reproduire, distribuer et communiquer) et de l’adapter à des fins non commerciales pourvu que l’œuvre soit adéquatement attribuée à son auteur et qu’en cas de réutilisation ou de distribution, les termes de cette licence soient clairement énoncés.
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication.
Les auteurs peuvent également conclure des ententes contractuelles additionnelles et séparées pour la diffusion non exclusive de la version de l’œuvre publiée par la revue (par ex. : l’affichage dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la parution dans un livre) qui devra être accompagnée d’une mention reconnaissant sa publication initiale dans cette revue.