Illuminating Details: Reflections on a Practice of Anthropology

Noel Dyck

doi:10.3138/anth-2020-0009

Auteurs-es

Noel Dyck Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Simon Fraser University in Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.3138/anth-2020-0009

Mots-clés :

comparaison, relations autochtones-états, savoir, récit passions, sport, tutelle

Résumé

Ce discours mis à jour pour la remise du Prix Weaver-Tremblay 2019 revisite certaines questions sous-jacentes à la pratique de l’anthropologie que j’ai abordées dans mes propres travaux. Premièrement, pourquoi choisir l’anthropologie comme mode d’investigation intellectuelle et pratique des phénomènes sociaux et culturels? Deuxièmement, quels types de pratiques anthropologiques peut-on exercer? Enfin, quels types de savoirs peut-on acquérir par l’intermédiaire d’approches anthropologiques et à quelles fins ces savoirs peuvent-ils être appliquées? Ces questions sont examinées du point de vue de deux champs d’investigation anthropologique assez différents que j’ai moi-même explorés: les relations entre les peuples autochtones et les gouvernements étatiques, d’une part, et la construction sociale du sport, d’autre part. En plus de partager des similitudes analytiques inattendues, ces champs apparemment disparates témoignent du pouvoir qui réside dans le type de détails révélateurs que les anthropologues sont particulièrement habiles à reconnaître.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Références

Assembly of First Nations. n.d. “First Nations Child and Family Services.” Accessed 24 July 2020. https://www.afn.ca/policy-sectors/social-secretariat/first-nations-child-and-family-services/.

Deloria, Vine, Jr. 1969. Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. New York: Macmillan.

Dyck, Noel. 1985. “Aboriginal Peoples and Nation-States: An Introduction to the Analytical Issues.” In Indigenous Peoples and the Nation-State: Fourth World Politics in Canada, Australia and Norway, edited by Noel Dyck, 1–26. St. John’s: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

——. 1986a. “Negotiating the Indian ‘Problem.’” Culture 6 (2): 31–41.

——. 1986b. “An Opportunity Lost: The Initiative of the Reserve Agricultural Programme in the Prairie West.” In 1885 and After: Native Society in Transition, edited by F.L. Barron and James B. Waldram, 121–138. Regina, SK: Canadian Plains Research Center.

——. 1991. What Is the Indian “Problem”: Tutelage and Resistance in Canadian Indian Administration. St. John’s: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

——. 1995. “Parents, Consociates and the Social Construction of Children’s Athletics.” Anthropological Forum 7 (2): 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.1995.9967455.

——. 1997a. Differing Visions: Administering Indian Residential Schooling in Prince Albert, 1867–1995. Halifax: Fernwood.

——. 1997b. “Tutelage, Resistance and Co-optation in Canadian Indian Administration.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 34 (3): 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618x.1997.tb00212.x.

——, ed. 2000. Games, Sports and Cultures. Oxford: Berg.

——. 2011. “In Pursuit of the ‘Full Ride’: American Athletic Scholarships and Mobility, Sport and Childhood in Canada.” Anthropologica 53 (1): 53–66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41475729.

——. 2012. Fields of Play: An Ethnography of Children’s Sports. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Dyck, Noel, and Eduardo E.P. Archetti, eds. 2003. Sport, Dance and Embodied Identities. Oxford: Berg.

Dyck, Noel, with visual images by Ryan Gauvin. 2012. “Dressing Up to Join the Games: Vancouver 2010.” Visual Studies 27 (2): 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586x.2012.677259.

Dyck, Noel, and Hans K. Hognestad. 2015.” Anthropological Perspectives and the Sociology of Sport.” In Routledge Handbook of Sociology of Sport, edited by Richard Giuliannoti, 123–132. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Hawthorn, Harry, ed., with H.A.C. Cairns, S.M. Jamieson, and K. Lysyk. 1966. A Survey of the Contemporary Indians of Canada: Economic, Political, Educational Needs and Policies, vol. 1. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.

Hawthorn, Harry, ed., with M.A. Tremblay, F.G. Vallee, and J. Ryan. 1967. A Survey of the Contemporary Indians of Canada: Economic, Political, Educational Needs and Policies, vol. 2. Ottawa: Queen’s Printer.

McLeod, Neal. 2005. “McLeod, John R. (1922–1980).” Indigenous Saskatchewan Encyclopedia. Regina, SK: Canadian Plains Research Centre, University of Regina. Accessed 24 July 2020. https://teaching.usask.ca/indigenoussk/import/mcleod_john_r_1922-80.php.

Paine, Robert. 1977. “The Nursery Game: Colonizers and the Colonized.” In The White Arctic: Anthropological Essays on Tutelage and Ethnicity, edited by Robert Paine, 77–106. St. Johns: Institute of Social and Economic Research, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Sansom, Basil. 1980. The Camp at Wallaby Cross: Aboriginal Fringe Dwellers in Darwin. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.

Tremblay, Marc-Adélard. 1983. “Anthropology in Question: What Knowledge and Knowledge for What?” In Consciousness and Inquiry: Ethnology and Canadian Realities, edited by Frank Manning, 332–347. Canadian Ethnology Service Paper 89E. Mercury Series. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada.

Weaver, Sally M. 1993. “The Hawthorn Report: Its Use in the Making of Canadian Indian Policy.” In Anthropology, Public Policy and Native Peoples in Canada, edited by Noel Dyck and James B. Waldram, 75–97. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press.