Plans for Altering Work: Fitting Kids into Car-Management Documents in a Swedish Preschool
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.60.1.t22Mots-clés :
documentation, agenciété, organisation, plans d'action, modèle de gestion Lean, établissements préscolairesRésumé
Cet article concerne les documents de plans d'action du modèle de gestion Lean Management et les types de valeurs et de savoirs qu'ils projettent quand ils sont utilisés dans les établissements préscolaires publics suédois. Lean, aussi connu sous le nom du modèle Toyota, provient de l'industrie automobile. Deux particularités de ce modèle sont l'élimination des déchets et la mise en place d'un système d'amélioration continue des processus afin d'en assurer l'efficience. Cet article explore les absurdités dues au transfert d'un modèle de gestion et de planification scientifiques propre à l'industrie automobile au système préscolaire où la planification rigide ignore la flexibilité et ne répond pas aux besoins parfois urgents des personnes.
Téléchargements
Références
Baines, Donna, Sara Charlesworth, Darrell Turner, and Laura O'Neill. 2014. “Lean Social Care and Worker Identity: The Role of Outcomes, Supervision and Mission.” Critical Social Policy 34(4): 433–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018314538799
Brenneis, Don. 2006. “Reforming Promise.” In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Annelise Riles, 41–70. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Bromley, Patricia, and John W. Meyer. 2015. Hyper-organization: Global Organizational Expansion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689859.001.0001
Brunsson, Nils, and Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson. 2000. “Constructing Organizations: The Case of Public Sector Reform.” Organization Studies 21(4): 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600214003
Fine, Ben, Brian Golden, Rosemary Hannam, and Dante J. Morra. 2009. “Leading Lean: A Canadian Healthcare Leader's Guide.” Healthcare Quarterly 12(3): 23–41. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcq.2013.20877
Garsten, Christina, Jessica Lindvert, and Renita Thedvall, eds. 2015. Makeshift Work in a Changing Labour Market: The Swedish Model in the Post-financial Crisis Era. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783479740
Hall, Patrik. 2008. Managementbyråkrati. Organisationspolitisk makt i svensk offentlig förvaltning. Malmö: Liber
Harper, Richard. 1998. Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organisational Action. San Diego: Academic Press
Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration 69(1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1991.tb00779.x
Hull, Matthew S. 2012. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520272149.001.0001
Kanamori, Shogo, Seydou Sow, Marcia C. Castro, Rui Matsuno, Akiko Tsuru, and Masamine Jimba. 2015. “Implementation of 5S management method for Lean Healthcare at a Health Center in Senegal: A Qualitative Study of Staff Perception.” Global Health Action 8: 1–9
Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and Social Analysis of Material Things.” Language & Communication 23(3-4): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” Current Anthropology 52(S3): S83–S95. https://doi.org/10.1086/657241
Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Proudlove, Nathan, Claire Moxham, and Ruth Boaden. 2008. “Lessons from Lean in Healthcare from Using Six Sigma in the NHS.” Public Money & Management 28(1): 27–34
Riles, Annalise, ed. 2006. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.185485
Rose, Nicholas, and Peter Miller. 1992. “Political Power beyond the State: Problematics of Government.” British Journal of Sociology 43(2): 173–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/591464
Røvik, Kjell-Arne. 2002. “The Secrets of the Winners: Management Ideas That Flow.” In The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows and Sources, ed. Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson and Lars Engwall, 113–144. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Sahlin-Anderson, Kerstin. 2001. “National, International and Transnational Constructions of New Public Management.” In New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, ed. Tom Christensen and Per Lægreid, 43–72. Aldershot: Ashgate
Sahlin-Andersson, Kerstin, and Lars Engwall. 2002. The Expansion of Management Knowledge: Carriers, Flows and Sources. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Sandler, Jen, and Renita Thedvall, eds. 2017. Meeting Ethnography: Meetings as Key Technologies of Contemporary Governance, Development, and Resistance, Studies in Anthropology. New York: Routledge
SFS (Svensk författningssamling) 2010:800. 2010. Skollagen (Education Act). Sveriges Riksdag (Swedish Parliament)
Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright. 2000. “Coercive Accountability: The Rise of Audit Culture in Higher Education.” In Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy, ed. Marilyn Strathern, 57–89. London: Routledge
Shore, Cris, and Susan Wright2015. “Audit Culture Revisited: Rankings, Ratings, and the Reassembling of Society.” Current Anthropology 56(3): 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1086/681534
Skolverket (Swedish National Agency for Education). Curriculum for the Preschool Lpfö 98. 1998. Revised 2010. Stockholm: Skolverket.
Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1994. “Institutional Conditions for Diffusion.” In Institutional Environments and Organizations: Structural Complexity and Individualism, ed. Walter R. Scott and John W. Meyer, 100–112. London: Sage
Strathern, Marilyn, ed. 2000. Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203449721
Suárez-Barraza, Manuel F., and Juan Ramis-Pujol. 2010. “Implementation of Lean-Kaizen in the Human Resource Service Process: A Case Study in a Mexican Public Service Organization.” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 21(3): 388–410. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410381011024359
Suárez-Barraza, Manuel F., Tricia Smith, and Su Mi Dahlgaard-Park. 2009. “Lean-Kaizen Public Service: An Empirical Approach in Spanish Local Government.” TQM Journal 21(2): 143–167. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730910938146
Thedvall, Renita. 2006. Eurocrats at Work: Negotiating Transparency in Postnational Employment Policy. Dissertation in social anthropology, Stockholm University. Stockholm: Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology 58
Thedvall, Renita. 2012. “Negotiating Impartial Indicators: To Put Transparency into Practice in the EU.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 18(2): 311–329
Thedvall, Renita. 2013. “Punctuated Entries: Doing Fieldwork in Policy Meetings in the EU.” In Organisational Anthropology: Doing Ethnography in and among Complex Organisations, ed. Christina Garsten and Anette Nyqvist, 106–119. London: Pluto Press
Thedvall, Renita. 2015. “Managing Preschool the Lean Way: Evaluating Work Processes by Numbers and Colours.” In “Governing by Numbers: Audit Culture Revisited,” ed. Cris Shore and Susan Wright. Special issue, Social Anthropology 23(1): 42–52
Tortorella, Guilherme Luz, Flávio Sanson Fogliatto, Michel Anzanello, Guiliano Almeida Marodin, Mayara Garcia, and Rafael Reis Esteves. 2017. “Making the Value Flow: Application of Value Stream Mapping in a Brazilian Public Healthcare Organization.” Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 28(13): 1544–1558
Womack, James P, Daniel T. Jones, and Daniel Roos. 1990. The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York: Rawson Associates and Macmillan
Wurm, Julianne P. 2005. Working in the Reggio Way: A Beginner's Guide for American Teachers. St. Paul, MN: Redleaf Press
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui collaborent avec Anthropologica consentent à publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution – Utilisation non commerciale 4.0 – International. Cette licence permet à quiconque de partager l’œuvre (reproduire, distribuer et communiquer) et de l’adapter à des fins non commerciales pourvu que l’œuvre soit adéquatement attribuée à son auteur et qu’en cas de réutilisation ou de distribution, les termes de cette licence soient clairement énoncés.
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication.
Les auteurs peuvent également conclure des ententes contractuelles additionnelles et séparées pour la diffusion non exclusive de la version de l’œuvre publiée par la revue (par ex. : l’affichage dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la parution dans un livre) qui devra être accompagnée d’une mention reconnaissant sa publication initiale dans cette revue.