Introduction: Document/ation: Power, Interests, Accountabilities
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.60.1.t16Mots-clés :
documents, organisations, matérialité, culture d'audit, bureaucratie, surveillance, vie quotidienneRésumé
Dans cette introduction, nous avançons que l'attention ethnographique portée aux documents, un élément banal de notre quotidien, peut révéler des manœuvres sociales qui accélèrent ou préservent des configurations particulières de pouvoir et d'imputabilité. Nous employons l'expression « document/ation » pour rendre compte des possibles relevant des moments d'action. Les articles de ce numéro spécial mettent en évidence les tensions dynamiques entre la systématisation et l'ambigüité qui résultent des situations de vérification, d'appréciation et de validation.
Téléchargements
Références
Adams, Vincanne, ed. 2016. Metrics: What Counts in Global Health. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822374480
Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso
Biruk, Crystal. 2012. “Seeing Like a Research Project: Producing ‘High Quality Data' in AIDS Research in Malawi.” Medical Anthropology 31(4): 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2011.631960
Biruk, Crystal. 2018. Cooking Data: Culture and Politics in an African Research World. Durham: Duke University Press
Bittner, Egon. 1965. “The Concept of Organization.” Social Research 32(3): 239–255
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507
Breckenridge, Keith. 2014. Biometric State: The Global Politics of Identification and Surveillance in South Africa, 1850 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939546
Brenneis, Don. 2006. “Reforming Promise.” In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Annelise Riles, 41–70. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Briet, Suzanne. 2006. What Is Documentation? ed. and trans. R.E. Day and L. Martinet. Lanham: Scarecrow. First published 1951
Brown, John Seely, and Paul Duguid. 1996. “The Social Life of Documents.” First Monday 1(1): n.p. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/466/387
Brown, John Seely, and Paul Duguid. 2000. The Social Life of Information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press
Bubandt, Nils. 2009. “From the Enemy's Point of View: Violence, Empathy, and the Ethnography of Fakes. Cultural Anthropology 24(3): 553–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2009.01040.x
Buckland, Michael K. 1997. “What Is a ‘Document'?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48(9): 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199709)48:9<804::AID-ASI5>3.0.CO;2-V
Butt, Leslie. 2018. “Absence and Ambiguity: Documenting the Moment of Birth in East Lombok, Indonesia.” Anthropologica 60(1): 205–215
Cabot, Heath. 2012. “The Governance of Things: Documenting Limbo in the Greek Asylum Procedure.” Political and Legal Anthropology Review 35(1): 11–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2012.01177.x
Clarke, Adele E., and Susan Leigh Star. 2008. “The Social Worlds Framework: Theory/Methods Package.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. E.J. Hackett, 113–137. Cambridge: MIT Press
Comaroff, Jean, and John Comaroff. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226114477.001.0001
Coutin, Susan. 2003. Legalizing Moves: Salvadoran Immigrants' Struggle for U.S. Residency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Ecks, Stefan. 2018. “‘When the Government Changes, the Card Will Also Change': Questioning Identity in Biometric Smartcards for National Health Insurance (RSBY) in India.” Anthropologica 60(1): 194–204
Erikson, Susan. 2012. “Global Health Business: The Production and Performativity of Statistics in Sierra Leone and Germany.” Medical Anthropology 31(4): 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2011.621908
Erikson, Susan. 2015. “Global Health Indicators and Maternal Health Futures: The Case of Intrauterine Growth Restriction.” Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice 10(10): 1157–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2015.1034155
Escobar, Arturo. 1995. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Favret-Saada, Jeanne. 1980. Deadly Words: Witchcraft in the Bocage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ferguson, James. 1994. The Anti-Politics Machine: “Development,” Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press
Grinberg, Omri. 2018. “Facsimileing the State: The Bureaucracy of Document Transmission in Israeli Human Rights.” Anthropologica 60(1): 263–277
Hacking, Ian. 1986. “Making Up People.” In Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the Self in Western Thought, ed. Thomas C. Heller, Morton Sosna, and David E. Wellbery, 161–171. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Harper, Ian. 2005. “Interconnected and Interinfected: DOTS and the Stabilisation of the Tuberculosis Control Programme in Nepal.” In The Aid Effect: Giving and Governing in International Development, ed. David Mosse and David Lewis, 126–149. London: Pluto
Harper, Richard. 1998. Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organizational Action. San Diego: Academic Press
Hartswood, Mark, Mark Rouncefield, Roger Slack, and Andrew Carlin. 2011. “Documents.” In Ethnomethodology at Work, ed. Mark Rouncefield and Peter Tolmie, 151–171. Farnham: Ashgate
Hetherington, Kregg. 2011. The Politics of Transparency in Neoliberal Paraguay. Durham: Duke University Press
Hull, Matthew. 2012a. Government of Paper: The Materiality of Bureaucracy in Urban Pakistan. Berkeley: University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520272149.001.0001
Hull, Matthew. 2012b. “Documents and Bureaucracy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 41(1): 251–267. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104953
Inglis, Kathleen. 2018. “Burden of Proof: Documentation of an HIV Prevention Program in Ghana.” Anthropologica 60(1): 250–262
Kalman, Ian. 2018. “Proofing Exemption: Documenting Indigeneity at the Canada–US Border.” Anthropologica 60(1): 216–226.
Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and the Social Analysis of Material Things.” Language & Communication 23(3–4): 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7
Kingori, Patricia, and René Gerrets. 2016. “Morals, Morale and Motivations in Data Fabrication: Medical Research Fieldworkers Views and Practices in Two Sub-Saharan African Contexts.” Social Science & Medicine 166: 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.019
Lakoff, George. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago press
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Latour, Bruno. 2000. “When Things Strike Back: A Possible Contribution of ‘Science Studies' to the Social Sciences.” British Journal of Sociology 51(1): 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/000713100358453
Lowenkron, Laura, and Leticia Ferreira. 2014. “Anthropological Perspectives on Documents. Ethnographic Dialogues on the Trail of Police Papers.” Vibrant: Virtual Brazilian Anthropology 11(2): n.p. http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-43412014000200003#tx04
Merry, Sally Engle. 2011. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” Current Anthropology 52 (S3 Suppl 3): S83–S95. https://doi.org/10.1086/657241
Papen, Uta. 2008. “Pregnancy Starts with a Literacy Event: Pregnancy and Antenatal Care as Textually Mediated Experiences.” Ethnography 9(3): 377–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138108094976
Pigg, Stacy Leigh. 1997. “‘Found in Most Traditional Societies': Traditional Medical Practitioners between Culture and Development.” In International Development and the Social Sciences, ed. Frederick Cooper and Randall M. Packard, 259–290. Berkeley: University of California Press
Pigg, Stacy Leigh. 2001. “Languages of Sex and AIDS in Nepal: Notes on the Social Production of Commensurability. In “Anthropology and/in/of Science,” special issue, Cultural Anthropology 16(4): 481–541. https://doi.org/10.1525/can.2001.16.4.481
Power, Michael. 1997. The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Price, Derek J. De Solla. 1963. Little Science, Big Science … and Beyond. New York: Columbia University Press
Riles, Annelise. 1998. “Infinity within the Brackets.” American Ethnologist 25(3): 378–398. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1998.25.3.378
Riles, Annelise. 2000. The Network Inside Out. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Riles, Annelise., ed. 2006. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.185485
Rozenblit, Leonid, and Frank Keil. 2002. “The Misunderstood Limits of Folk Science: An Illusion of Explanatory Depth.” Cognitive Science 26(5): 521–562. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2605_1
Schneider, Barbara. 2007. “Power as Interactional Accomplishment: An Ethnomethodological Perspective on the Regulation of Communicative Practice in Organizations.” In Communicative Practices in Workplaces and the Professions: Cultural Perspectives on the Regulation of Discourse and Organizations, ed. Mark Zachry and Charlotte Thralls, 181–199. New York: Baywood Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.2190/CPIC9
Shore, Cris, and Sharon Wright. 2015. “Audit Cultures Revisited: Ratings, Rankings and the Reassembling of Society.” Cultural Anthropology 56(3): 421–444
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language, Structure and Linguistic Ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. P.R. Clyne, W.F. Hanks, and C.L. Hofbauer, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Smith, Dorothy. 1990. Texts, Facts, and Femininity: Exploring the Relations of Ruling. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203425022
Smith, Dorothy. 2005. Institutional Ethnography. Oxford: Altamira Press
Stoler, Ann. 2002. “Colonial Archives and the Arts of Governance.” Archival Science 2(1–2): 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435632
Strathern, Marilyn. 2006. “Bullet-Proofing: A Tale from the United Kingdom.” In Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge, ed. Annelise Riles, 181–205. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
Strauss, Anselm. 1978. “A Social World Perspective.” Studies in Symbolic Interaction 1: 119–128
Taussig, Michael. 1984. “Culture of Terror, Space of Death. Roger Casement's Putumayo Report and the Explanation of Torture.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 26(3): 467–497. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500011105
Thedvall, Renita. 2015. “Managing Preschool the Lean Way. Evaluating Work Processes by Numbers and Colours.” Social Anthropology 23(1): 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12105
Thedvall, Renita. 2018. “Plans for Altering Work: Fitting Kids into Car-Management Documents in a Swedish Preschool.” Anthropologica 60(1): 240–249
Thomson, Marnie J. 2012. “Black Boxes of Bureaucracy: Transparency and Opacity in the Resettlement Process of Congolese Refugees.” PoLAR 35(2): 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1555-2934.2012.01198.x
Thomson, Marnie J. 2018. “What Documents Do Not Do: Papering Persecution and Moments of Recognition in a Congolese Refugee Camp.” Anthropologica 60(1): 227–239
Weber, Max. 1946. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. and trans. H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills. New York: Oxford University Press
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui collaborent avec Anthropologica consentent à publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution – Utilisation non commerciale 4.0 – International. Cette licence permet à quiconque de partager l’œuvre (reproduire, distribuer et communiquer) et de l’adapter à des fins non commerciales pourvu que l’œuvre soit adéquatement attribuée à son auteur et qu’en cas de réutilisation ou de distribution, les termes de cette licence soient clairement énoncés.
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication.
Les auteurs peuvent également conclure des ententes contractuelles additionnelles et séparées pour la diffusion non exclusive de la version de l’œuvre publiée par la revue (par ex. : l’affichage dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la parution dans un livre) qui devra être accompagnée d’une mention reconnaissant sa publication initiale dans cette revue.