Avant-propos : Retour sur le débat relatif aux territoires de chasse familiaux algonquiens
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.60.1.t05Mots-clés :
Cris, Eeyou Istchee, territoires de chasse familiaux, débat sur les territoires de chasse familiaux, terrains de piégeage enregistrés, autorité, conservation, gestion des ressources, communisme primitifRésumé
Il y a trente-deux ans, Anthropologica consacrait un double numéro aux controverses et polémiques ayant fait rage autour du régime foncier des Algonquiens du nord, notamment autour de la nature des territoires de chasse familiaux, identifiés et désignés pour la première fois par Frank Speck en 1915, conformément aux conceptions occidentales de la propriété. En 1970, les voix dominantes étaient celles d'Eleanor Leacock et de Julian Steward qui réfutaient tous deux l'affirmation de Speck selon laquelle ce régime foncier était autochtone. Ceux-ci soutenaient, au contraire, qu'il était issu du commerce européen de la fourrure. L'opposition était si forte qu'on en est venu à la qualifier de débat. Par la suite, dans les années 1970, des étudiants en anthropologie ont découvert que les territoires de chasse familiaux, notamment ceux des Cris de l'est de la baie James, les Eeyou Istchee, ne correspondaient pas à ce qu'en disait la littérature. Revenant sur la publication de 1986, cette communication retrace l'histoire de ce débat et extrait des articles des différents auteurs les principaux arguments relatifs aux pratiques des Cris et des autres peuples subarctiques. Parmi les sujets abordés figurent la nature de la territorialité, la flexibilité du système cri, les attentes des maitres de chasse, le chevauchement entre systèmes traditionnels et gouvernementaux, la gestion des ressources et la documentation historique de l'existence précoce de territoires de chasse familiaux. Leacock ayant formulé son rejet de l'idée d'un développement précoce des territoires de chasse familiaux à la lumière du communisme primitif, ce thème est lui aussi réexaminé.
Téléchargements
Références
Bailey, Alfred G. 1969. The Conflict of European and Eastern Algonkian Cultures, 1504–1700. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442656475
Berkes, Fikret. 1986. “Common Property Resources and Hunting Territories.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 145–162
Bishop, Charles A. 1986. “Territoriality among Northeastern Algonquians.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 37–63
Bishop, Charles A., and Toby Morantz, eds. 1986. “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered.” Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2)
Cooper, John. 1939. “Is the Algonquian Family Hunting Ground System Pre-Colombian?” American Anthropologist 41(1): 66–90. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1939.41.1.02a00060
Craik, Brian. 1986. “Making a Living in the Bush: Land Tenure at Waskaganish.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 175–186. https://doi.org/10.2307/25605198
Feit, Harvey A. 1991. “The Construction of Algonquian Hunting Territories. Private Property as Moral Lesson, Policy Advocacy and Ethnographic Error.” In Colonial Situations: Essays on the Contextualization of Ethnographic Knowledge, ed. George W. Stocking Jr., 109–134. History of Anthropology 7. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
Feit, Harvey A. 2009. “Histories of the Past, Histories of the Future: The Committed Anthropologies of Richard Slobodin, Frank G. Speck and Eleanor Leacock.” In A Kindly Scrutiny of Human Nature: Essays in Honour of Richard Slobodin, ed. Richard Preston, 45–76. Waterloo: Wilfred Laurier University Press
Flannery, Regina, and M. Elizabeth Chambers. 1986. “John M. Cooper's Investigation of James Bay Family Hunting Grounds, 1927–1934.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 108–144. https://doi.org/10.2307/25605195
Hymes, Dell. 1974. “Introduction: The Use of Anthropology: Critical, Political, Personal.” In Reinventing Anthropology, ed. Dell Hymes, 5–79. New York: Vintage Books. First published 1969 by Random House.
Jenness, Diamond. 1932. The Indians of Canada. Ottawa: National Museum of Canada, Bulletin 65
Knight, Rolf. 1965. “A Re-examination of Hunting, Trapping and Territoriality among the Northeastern Algonkian Indians.” In Man, Culture and Animals, ed. Anthony Leeds and Andrew P. Vayda, 27–42. American Association for the Advancement of Science Publication 78. Washington, D.C.
Leacock, Eleanor. 1954. The Montagnais “Hunting Territory” and the Fur Trade. American Anthropological Association Memoir 78. Menasha, Wisconsin: American Anthropological Association
Leacock, Eleanor. 1958. Status among the Montagnais-Naskapi of Labrador. Ethnohistory (Columbus, Ohio) 5(3):200–209. https://doi.org/10.2307/480663
Leacock, Eleanor. 1972 Introduction to The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State, by Frederick Engels, 7–67. New York: International Publishers
Leacock, Eleanor. 1982. “Relations of Production in Band Society.” In Politics and History in Band Societies, ed. Eleanor Leacock and Richard Lee, 159–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lee, Richard. 1982. “Politics, Sexual and Non-sexual, in an Egalitarian Society.” In Politics and History in Band Societies, ed. Eleanor Leacock and Richard Lee, 37–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lee, Richard B., and Jacqueline S. Solway. 1990. “Foragers, Genuine or Spurious? Situating the Kalahari San in History.” Current Anthropology 31(2): 109–146. https://doi.org/10.1086/203816
Mailhot, José. 1986. “Territorial Mobility among the Montagnais-Naskapi of Labrador.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 92–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/25605194
Morantz, Toby. 1983. An Ethnohistoric Study of Eastern James Bay Cree Social Organization, 1700–1850. Canadian Ethnology Service Paper 88. Ottawa: National Museums of Canada
Morantz, Toby. 2002. The White Man's Gonna Getcha: The Colonial Challenge to the Crees in Quebec. Montreal, Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press
Oldmixon, John. 1931. “The History of Hudson Bay.” In Documents Relating of the Early History of Hudson Bay, ed. J.B. Tyrrell, 371–410. Toronto: Champlain Society. First published 1708
Preston, Richard J. 1986. “Introduction: Reflections on Territoriality.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 11–18
Rogers, Edward S. 1986. “Epilogue: Reevaluation and Future Considerations.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 203–216
Savishinsky, Joel S. 1978. “Trapping, Survival Strategies and Environmental Involvement: A Case Study from the Canadian Sub-Arctic.” Human Ecology 6(1): 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00888564
Scott, Colin. 1986. “Hunting Territories, Hunting Bosses and Communal Production among Coastal James Bay Cree.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 163–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/25605197
Sieciechowicz, Krystyna. 1986. “Northern Ojibwa Land Tenure.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 187–202
Snow, Dean R. 1968. “Wabanaki ‘Family Hunting Territories.'” American Anthropologist 70(6): 1143–1151. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1968.70.6.02a00080
Speck, Frank G. 1915. “The Family Hunting Band as the Basis of Algonkian Social Organization.” American Anthropologist 17(2): 289–305. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1915.17.2.02a00070
Speck, Frank G. 1917. “Social Structure of the Northern Algonkian.” Publications of the American Sociological Society 12: 82–100
Speck, Frank G. 1923. “Mistassini Hunting Territories in the Labrador Peninsula.” American Anthropologist 25(4): 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1923.25.4.02a00030
Speck, Frank G., and Loren C. Eiseley. 1939. “The Significance of the Hunting Territory Systems of the Algonkian in Social Theory.” American Anthropologist 41(2): 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1939.41.2.02a00080
Steward, Julian H. 1955. Theory of Culture Change: The Methodology of Multilinear Evolution. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
Steward, Julian H. 1960 John Reed Swanton, 1873–1958. A Biographical Memoir. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC. http://www.nasonline.org/publications/biographical-memoirs/memoir-pdfs/swanton- john.pdf
Tanner, Adrian. 1971. “Existe-il des territoires de chasse? Bulletin d'information.” Recherches Amerindiennes au Quebec 1(4–5): 69–83
Tanner, Adrian. 1973. “The Significance of Hunting Territories Today.” In Cultural Ecology: Readings on the Canadian Indians and Eskimos, ed. Bruce Cox, 101–114. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart
Tanner, Adrian. 1986 “The New Hunting Territory Debate: An Introduction to Some Unresolved Issues.” In “Who Owns the Beaver? Northern Algonquian Land Tenure Reconsidered,” ed. Charles Bishop and Toby Morantz. Special issue, Anthropologica 28 (1–2): 19–36
Tanner, Adrian. 2014 [1979]. Bringing Home Animals. Mistissini Hunters of Northern Quebec. St. John's: Memorial University, ISER
Wilmsen, Edwin N. 1989. Land Filled with Flies: A Political Economy of the Kalahari. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Téléchargements
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Les auteurs qui collaborent avec Anthropologica consentent à publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution – Utilisation non commerciale 4.0 – International. Cette licence permet à quiconque de partager l’œuvre (reproduire, distribuer et communiquer) et de l’adapter à des fins non commerciales pourvu que l’œuvre soit adéquatement attribuée à son auteur et qu’en cas de réutilisation ou de distribution, les termes de cette licence soient clairement énoncés.
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication.
Les auteurs peuvent également conclure des ententes contractuelles additionnelles et séparées pour la diffusion non exclusive de la version de l’œuvre publiée par la revue (par ex. : l’affichage dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la parution dans un livre) qui devra être accompagnée d’une mention reconnaissant sa publication initiale dans cette revue.