The Melancholy Monument of the Left
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica64120221024Mots-clés :
Mélancolie, mémoire, arts relationnels, histoire, monument, left, RussieRésumé
De novembre 2017 à avril 2018, un collectif d’artistes activistes russes Chto delat (que devrions-nous faire ?) a exposé un certain nombre d’œuvres en mémoire de la révolution russe, au Museo Universitario Arte Contemporaneo (Musée universitaire d’art contemporain) de la Ville de Mexico. En me concentrant sur trois monuments, j’examine dans cet article la capacité des monuments du collectif à inspirer des médiations politiques sur le potentiel historique, ancré dans les passés révolutionnaires. Je soutiens que la mélancolie ne marque pas inévitablement une fixité historique ou un deuil inachevé, mais plutôt une ouverture temporelle à la productivité mnémonique et à la solidarité. En ce sens, la mélancolie n’indexe pas une réponse pathologique à la perte, mais plutôt une alternative politique au deuil normatif. En récupérant la mélancolie comme une relation potentiellement productive et critique au passé, Chto delat reformule les accusations de mélancolie de la gauche « coincée Anthropologica 64.1 (2022) The Melancholy Monument of the Left 1 dans le passé » comme une ouverture pour considérer des alternatives à ce qui est actuel aujourd’hui.
Téléchargements
Références
Bardawil, Fadi A. 2020. Revolution and Disenchantment: Arab Marxism and the Binds of Emancipation. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478007586
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1993. “Benjamin The Intellectual.” New Formations 20: 47–57.
Benjamin, Walter. 1996 [1931]. “Left-Wing Melancholy.” In Selected Writings, Volume 2: Part 2, 1931—1934, edited by Michael W. Jennings, Howard Eiland, and Gary Smith, 423–427. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press.
——. 2003 [1940]. On the Concept of History. In Selected Writings, Volume 4: 1938—1940, edited by Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings, 389–400. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknapp Press of Harvard University Press.
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. New York: Verso.
Boyer, Dominic. 2006. “Ostalgie and the Politics of the Future in Eastern Germany.” Public Culture 18 (2): 361–381. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2006-008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2006-008
Boym, Svetlana. 2002. The Future of Nostalgia. New York: Basic Books.
Brown, Wendy. 1999. “Resisting Left Melancholy.” boundary 2 26 (3): 19–27. https://www.jstor.org/stable/303736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J111v26n01_05
Buck-Morss, Susan. 2002. Dreamworld and Catastrophe: The Passing of Mass Utopia in East and West. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Budraitskis, Ilya. 2017. “A Heritage without an Heir.” In Cosmic Shift: Russian Contemporary Art Writing, edited by Elena Zaytseva and Alex Anikina, 313–332. London: Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350219397.ch-018
Bürger, Peter. 1984. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Translated by Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Çelik, Zeynep. 1997. Urban Forms and Colonial Confrontations: Algiers under French Rule. Berkely: University of California Press.
Chantiluke, Roseanne, Brian Kwoba, and Athinangamso Nkopo, eds. 2018. Rhodes Must Fall: The Struggle to Decolonise the Racist Heart of Empire. London: Zed Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350222380
Flatley, Jonathan. 2001. “Moscow and Melancholia.” Social Text 19 (1): 75–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-19-1_66-75
Foster, Hal. 1996. The Return of the Real: The Avant-Garde at the End of the Century. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
Gabowitsch, Mischa. 2017. Protest in Putin’s Russia. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gough, Mari. 2005. The Artist as Producer: Russian Constructivism in Revolution. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland: AK Press.
——. 2002. “The New Anarchists.” New Left Review 13 (Jan-Feb): 61–73.
Grant, Bruce. 2001. “New Moscow Monuments, or, States of Innocence.” American Ethnologist 28 (2): 332–362. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2001.28.2.332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.2001.28.2.332
Groys, Boris. 2014. On the New. Translated by G.M. Goshgarian. London: Verso.
Jackson, Matthew J. 2010. The Experimental Group: Ilya Kabakov, Moscow Conceptualism, Soviet Avant-Gardes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226389363.001.0001
Jonson, Lena. 2015. Art and Protest in Putin’s Russia. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315728469
Juris, Jeffrey, and Alex Khasnabish, eds. 2013. Insurgent Encounters: Transnational Activism, Ethnography, and the Political. Duke: Durham University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395867
Kabakov, Ilya and Emilia, eds. 2017. Cosmic Shift: Russian Contemporary Art Writing. London: Zed Books.
Kester, Grant H. 2011. The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822394037
Kiaer, Christina. 2005. Imagine No Possessions: The Socialist Objects of Russian Constructivism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Lomasko, Victoria. 2011. Other Russias. Translated by Thomas Campbell. London: Penguin Books.
Margolin, Victor. 1997. The Struggle for Utopia: Rodchenko, Lissitzky, Moholy-Nagy, 1917–1946. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marschall, Sabine. 2017. “Targeting Statues: Monument “Vandalism” as an Expression of Sociopolitical Protest in South Africa.” African Studies Review 60 (3): 203–219. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2017.56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2017.56
Marx, Karl. 2005 [1897]. The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. Translated by D.D.L. New York: Mondial.
McKee, Yates. 2016. Strike Art: Contemporary Art and the Post-Occupy Condition. London: Verso.
Miéville, China. 2017. October: The Story of the Russian Revolution. London. Verso.
Morris, Rosalind. 2002. “Returning the Body without Haunting: Mourning Nai Phi and the End of Revolution in Thailand.” In Loss, edited by David Eng and David Kasanjian, 29–58. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Mrázek, Rudolf. 2010. A Certain Age: Colonial Jakarta through the Memories of Its Intellectuals. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26530/OAPEN_625230
Nadkarni, Maya. 2020. Remains of Socialism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501750175.001.0001
Oushakine, Serguei A. 2007. ““We’re Nostalgic, but We’re Not Crazy”: Retrofitting the Past in Russia.” The Russian Review 66 (3): 451–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9434.2007.00453.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9434.2007.00453.x
Ortner, Sherry. 2016. “Dark Anthropology and its Others: Theories since the Eighties.” Hau 6 (1): 47–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004
Perloff, Marjorie. 1986. The Futurist Moment: Avant-Garde, Avant Guerre, and the Language of Rupture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Raunig, Gerald. 2007. Art and Revolution: Transversal Activism in the Long Twentieth Century. Translated by Aileen Derieg. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
Rethmann, Petra. 2008. Nostalgie à Moscou. Anthropologie et Sociétés 32 (1-2): 85–102.https://doi.org/10.7202/018884ar. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/018884ar
——. 2016. What Should be Done?: Art and Political Possibility in Russia. In Impulse to Act: A New Anthropology of Resistance and Social Justice, edited by Othon Alexandrakis, 152–179. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Rethmann, Petra, and Ilya Budraitskis. n.d. Russia’s New Left and Other Evils.
Scott, David. 2004. Conscripts of Modernity: The Tragedy of Colonial Enlightenment. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822386186
Scribner, Charity. 2003. Requiem for Communism. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5906.001.0001
Serge, Victor. 2012. Memoirs of a Revolutionary. Translated by Peter Sedgwick. New York: New York Review of Books.
Taussig, Michael. 2006. Benjamin’s Grave. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Todorova, Maria, and Zsuzsa Gille, eds. 2010. Post-Communist Nostalgia. New York: Berghahn. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qd8t4
Thompson, Nato. 2017. Culture as Weapon: The Art of Influence in Everyday Life. Brooklyn: Melville House.
Traverso, Enzo. 2016. Left-Wing Melancholia: Marxism, History, and Memory. New York: Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/trav17942
Verdery, Katherine. 1999. The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York: Columbia Press.
Werckmeister, Otto K. 1999. Icons of the Left: Benjamin and Eisenstein, Picasso and Kafka after the Fall of Communism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilder, Gary. 2015. Freedom Time: Negritude, Decolonization, and the Future of the World. Durham: Duke University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822375791
Yurchak, Alexei. 2014. “Revolutions and their Translators: Maidan, the Conflict in Ukraine, and the Russian New Left.” Society for Cultural Anthropology Editor’s Forum/Hot Spots. https://culanth.org/fieldsights/revolutions-and-their-translators-maidan-the-conflict-in-Ukraine-and-the-russian-new-left.
Young, James. 2000. The Texture of Memory: Holocaust Memory and Meaning. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Petra Rethmann 2022
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1969b/1969b75d43f222ee39a1dfab014e298d35e3fc1b" alt="Licence Creative Commons"
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale 4.0 International.
Les auteurs qui collaborent avec Anthropologica consentent à publier leurs articles sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution – Utilisation non commerciale 4.0 – International. Cette licence permet à quiconque de partager l’œuvre (reproduire, distribuer et communiquer) et de l’adapter à des fins non commerciales pourvu que l’œuvre soit adéquatement attribuée à son auteur et qu’en cas de réutilisation ou de distribution, les termes de cette licence soient clairement énoncés.
Les auteurs conservent leurs droits d’auteur et accordent à la revue le droit de première publication.
Les auteurs peuvent également conclure des ententes contractuelles additionnelles et séparées pour la diffusion non exclusive de la version de l’œuvre publiée par la revue (par ex. : l’affichage dans un dépôt institutionnel ou la parution dans un livre) qui devra être accompagnée d’une mention reconnaissant sa publication initiale dans cette revue.