Proofing Exemption: Documenting Indigeneity at the Canada–US Border

Ian Kalman

doi:10.3138/anth.60.1.t20

Authors

Ian Kalman Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Political Science, Western University, London, ON; Research Partner, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle (Saale), Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.60.1.t20

Keywords:

documentation, borders, policing, indigeneity, border officers, Akwesasne

Abstract

Document exemption is a form of documentation built upon maintaining documentary regimes while seemingly obviating them. An inquiry into this exemption expands anthropological assumptions about documentation. This article discusses forms of exemption instituted for Indigenous residents of the Akwesasne Mohawk territory when they cross the Canada–US border. I show how customary, de facto exemption from providing travel documents to border officers represented a workable way for Akwesasne residents and border officers to enact seemingly incompatible visions of sovereignty. De jure exemption for Akwesasne residents from paying taxes on cross-border goods, while locally desirable, also shows how “proving” one's status as can result in more state intrusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

American Indian Law Alliance. 2003. Border Crossing Rights under the Jay Treaty. New York: American Indian Law Alliance. http://ptla.org/border-crossing-rights-jay-treaty

Barth, Fredrik, ed. 1969. Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. Boston: Little, Brown

Baud, Michiel, and Willem Van Schendel. 1997. “Toward a Comparative History of Borderlands.” Journal of World History 8(2): 211–242. https://doi.org/10.1353/jwh.2005.0061

Billig, Michael. 1995. Banal Nationalism. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

CBC News. 2011. “Border Stories: First Nations Grapple with Cultural Divide. CBC News, August 24. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/border-stories-first-nations-grapple-with-cultural-divide-1.1072216

Deer, Tracey. 2008. Club Native. Montreal: Rezolution Pictures

Diamant-Rink, Sapphire. 2009. “Dividing Line: Borders as an International Indigenous Human Rights Issue.” Immigration and Nationality Law Review 30: 911

Helleiner, Jane. 2012. “Whiteness and Narratives of a Racialized Canada/US Border at Niagara.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 37(2): 109–135

Herzfeld, Michael. 1997. Cultural Intimacy: Social Poetics in the Nation-State. New York: Routledge

Indian Time. 2014. “What Forms of Identification Are Accepted at All CBSA Ports?” Indian Time, April 14. Akwesasne

Kalman, Ian. 2016. “Framing Borders: Indigenous Difference at the Canada/US Border.” PhD dissertation, McGill University

Navaro-Yashin, Yael. 2007. “Make-Believe Papers, Legal Forms and the Counterfeit Affective Interactions between Documents and People in Britain and Cyprus.” Anthropological Theory 7(1): 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499607074294

Pratt, Anna. 2010. “Between a Hunch and a Hard Place: Making Suspicion Reasonable at the Canadian Border.” Social & Legal Studies 19(4): 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910378434

Riles, Annelise, ed. 2006. Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.185485

Simpson, Audra. 2008. “Subjects of Sovereignty: Indigeneity, the Revenue Rule, and Juridics of Failed Consent.” Law and Contemporary Problems 71: 191–216

Simpson, Audra. 2014. Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life across the Borders of Settler States. Durham: Duke University Press.

Tägil, Sven, Kristian Gerner, Göran Henrikson, Rune Johansson, Ingmar Oldberg, and Kim Salomon. 1977. Studying Boundary Conflicts: A Theoretical Framework. Scandinavian University Books, Lund Studies in International History 9. Lund, Sweden: Esselte Studium.

Tanovich, David M. 2006. The Colour of Justice: Policing Race in Canada. Toronto: Irwin Law