Sharia and Shah Bano: Multiculturalism and Women's Rights

Authors

  • Amali Philips Wilfrid Laurier University

Keywords:

multiculturalism, personal laws, women's rights, cultural rights

Abstract

This article is a comparative examination of the 2005
sharia controversy surrounding the establishment of faith-based
arbitration in Ontario, Canada, and a similar controversy in India
after the 1985 Supreme Court Ruling favouring the claim of Shah
Bano, a Muslim woman who challenged her husband in court for
extended maintenance in contravention of Muslim Personal Law.
I use the two controversies to interrogate the contentious issue
of group rights and women's rights with particular reference to
religious-based personal laws. The two cases demonstrate the
patriarchal aspects of personal laws in the private and public
realms and their politicization in the public realm. They also
underscore the limits of multiculturalism in its potential to deal
with the impacts of multicultural accommodation of group rights
on the equality rights of women within these groups. My paper
emphasizes the need to move beyond multiculturalism and high-
lights the strategic importance of mainstreaming feminist citi-
zenship and human rights discourses into legal norms and practices relating to family law issues in multicultural societies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-03-15

How to Cite

Philips, A. (2022). Sharia and Shah Bano: Multiculturalism and Women’s Rights. Anthropologica, 53(2), 275–290. Retrieved from https://cas-sca.journals.uvic.ca/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/957