Potentiating Death and Governing Uncertain Futures: Guns, Assisted Dying and the Production of Sovereign Subjects
Both gun rights advocates and right-to-die activists shape their moral selves through time in relation to a demand of personal autonomy. Practising autonomy – having a sense of control over one’s own life and death – becomes the principle of the good for both gun advocates and right-to-die activists. Though the ethical aims of both groups could not be more different, both movements produce a similar kind of subject. Whether through guns or end-of-life technologies, the person who has control over death has control over life, resulting in a subject actively working in and through time. However, while right-to-die activists take their own lives into their sovereign hands, gun owners engage with an ethics of time to prove their capacity in deciding who may live and who must die.
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Anderson, Joe. 2017. “Gun Owners, Ethics, and the Problem of Evil: A Response to the Las Vegas Shooting.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 7 (3): 39–48. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau7.3.003.
Bear, Laura. 2016. “Time as Technique.” Annual Review of Anthropology 45: 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102313-030159.
Blanke, Charles, Michael LeBlanc, Dawn Hershman, Lee Ellis and Frank Meyskens. 2017. “Characterizing 18 Years of the Death with Dignity Act in Oregon.” JAMA Oncology 3 (10): 1403–1406. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0243.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. New York: Verso.
Carlson, Jennifer. 2012. “‘I Don’t Dial 911’: American Gun Politics and the Problem of Policing.” British Journal of Criminology 52: 1113–1132. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs039.
———. 2015. Citizen Protectors: The Everyday Politics of Guns in an Age of Decline. New York: Oxford University Press.
Critchley, Simon. 2007. Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance. New York: Verso.
Das, Veena. 1997. “Sufferings, Theodicies, Disciplinary Practices, Appropriations.” International Social Science Journal 49 (154): 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.1997.tb00045.x.
———. 2010. “Engaging the Life of the Other: Love and Everyday Life.” In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, edited by Michael Lambek, 376–399. New York: Fordham University Press.
———. 2015. “What Does Ordinary Ethics Look Like?” In Four Lectures on Ethics: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Michael Lambek, Veena Das, Didier Fassin and Webb Keane, 53–125. Chicago: HAU Books.
Dave, Naisargi. 2010. “Between Queer Ethics and Sexual Morality.” In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, edited by Michael Lambek, 368–375. New York: Fordham University Press.
Dunbar-Ortiz, Roxanne. 2018. Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment. San Francisco: City Light Books.
Fassin, Didier. 2008. “Beyond Good and Evil? Questioning the Anthropological Discomfort with Morals.” Anthropological Theory 8 (4): 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608096642.
Faubion, James D. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fitzpatrick, Brad. 2015. “Col. Jeff Cooper: Developing a Defensive Mindset.” Guns&Ammo, 17 August. https://www.gunsandammo.com/editorial/col-jeff-cooper-developing-a-defensive-mindset/249086 (accessed 20 February 2020).
Fridel, Emma E., and James Alan Fox. 2019. “Gender Differences in Patterns and Trends in U.S. Homicide, 1976–2017.” Violence and Gender 6 (1): 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1089/vio.2019.0005.
“Georgia ‘Guns Everywhere’ Law Takes Effect.” 2014. Al Jazeera America, 1 July. http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/7/1/georgia-guns-everywhere.html (accessed 20 February 2020).
Hanning, Anita. 2019. “Author(iz)ing Death: Medical Aid-in-Dying and the Morality of Suicide.” Cultural Anthropology 34 (1): 53–77. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca34.1.08.
Herzfeld, Michael. 1992. The Social Production of Indifference: Exploring the Symbolic Roots of Western Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kleinman, Arthur. 2006. What Really Matters: Living a Moral Life amidst Uncertainty and Danger. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lambek, Michael. 2010. “Introduction.” In Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action, edited by Michael Lambek, 1–36. New York: Fordham University Press.
Mattingly, Cheryl. 2018. “Ordinary Possibility, Transcendent Immanence, and Responsive Ethics: A Philosophical Anthropology of the Small Event.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 8 (1/2): 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1086/698269.
Mattingly, Cheryl, and Jason Throop. 2018. “The Anthropology of Ethics and Morality.” Annual Review of Anthropology 47: 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102317-050129.
Mbembe, Achille. 2003. “Necropolitics.” Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-15-1-11.
Melzers, Scott. 2012. Gun Crusaders: The NRA’s Culture War. New York: New York University Press.
Munn, Nancy D. 1992. “The Cultural Anthropology of Time: A Critical Essay.” Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 93–123. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521.
Ringel, Felix. 2016. “Beyond Temporality: Notes on the Anthropology of Time from a Shrinking Field Site.” Anthropological Theory 16 (4): 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499616659971.
Xu, Jiaquan, Sherry Murphy, Kenneth Kochanek, Brigham Bastian, and Elizabeth Arias. 2018. “Deaths: Final Data for 2016.” National Vital Statistics Report 67 (5): 1–76.
Copyright (c) 2020 Bradley Dunseith and Ari Gandsman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Anthropologica agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.