Redefining the Lexicon of Power, Envisioning the Future: The Atikamekw Nehirowisiw Nation and the Comprehensive Land Claims Negotiations

Benoit Éthier; Gérald Ottawa; Christian Coocoo

doi:10.3138/anth-2018-0054

Authors

Benoit Éthier École d’études autochtones (School of Indigenous Studies), Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Val-d’Or, Quebec, Canada
Gérald Ottawa Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw, La Tuque, Quebec, Canada
Christian Coocoo Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw, La Tuque, Quebec, Canada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/anth-2018-0054

Keywords:

Comprehensive Land Claims Policy, Indigenous legal order, Indigenous knowledge, Atikamekw Nehirowisiw, Canada

Abstract

Treaties and land claims negotiations between state institutions and Indigenous Peoples are necessarily tied to issues of territorial entanglements, resistance and coexistence. Regularly, studies of these negotiation dynamics make explicit the articulation and differentiation of Indigenous “life projects,” referring to the embodiment of socio-cultural desires, visions, aspirations and purposes – vis-à-vis neoliberal development projects. This article focuses precisely on the dynamics of negotiation in which the Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok (north-central Quebec) and state institutions have been involved for the last 40 years under the Comprehensive Land Claims Policy. More specifically, it addresses different policy mechanisms such as the extinguishment policy, burden of proof, debt obligations and results-based approach that are part and parcel of the negotiation process. Without disregarding the unequal power relations, this article also presents the motivations and aspirations expressed by the Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok in the negotiation process. It explains how their engagements are mobilised into nehirowisiw orocowewin – that is, a larger and deeper political and cultural project relating to the affirmation of nehirowisiw miro pimatisiwin, an Indigenous way of life and living well that is tied to the maintenance of a creative and open-ended coexistence based on reciprocity, complementarity, autonomy and consensus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asch, Michael, (ed.). (1998) 2008. Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Asch, Michael, and Norman Zlotkin. 2008. “Affirming Aboriginal Title: A New Basis for Comprehensive Claims Negotiations.” In Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equality, and Respect for Difference, edited by Michael Asch, 208–229. Vancouver: UBC Press.

Atikamekw Nehirowisiw, Innu and Anicinabe Coalition. 2014. Proceedings from the conference of Atikamekw Nehirowisiw, Innu and Anicinabe Coalition to defend their ancestral titles in the convention territory, Montreal, QC, 13 November.

Belrichard, Chantelle. 2019. “Budget 2019: $1.4B in Loans to Be Forgiven or Reimbursed to Indigenous Groups for Treaty Negotiations.” CBC News, 19 March. https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/budget-2019-treaty-loans-forgiven-1.5063128.

Blaser, Mario. 2004. “Life Projects: Indigenous Peoples’ Agency and Development.” In In the Way of Development: Indigenous Peoples, Life Projects and Globalization, edited by Mario Blaser, Harvey A. Feit, and Glenn McRae, 26–44. London: Zed Books.

——. 2013. “Ontological Conflicts and the Stories of Peoples in Spite of Europe: Toward a Conversation on Political Ontology.” Current Anthropology 54 (5): 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1086/672270.

Borrows, John. 2010. Canada’s Indigenous Constitution. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

——. 2016. Freedom and Indigenous Constitutionalism. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Brassard, Denis, and Daniel Castonguay. 1983. Nitaskinan: Recherche sur l’occupation et l’utilisation du territoire. Rapport synthèse. Village-des-Hurons, QC: Conseil Attikamek-Montagnais.

Calder v British Columbia, [1973] 3 SCR 313.

Castonguay, Daniel. 1983. Occupation et utilisation du territoire par les Attikameks de Manouane. Rapport communautaire. Village-des-Hurons, QC: Conseil Attikamek-Montagnais.

Charest, Paul. 1992. “La prise en charge donne-t-elle du pouvoir? L’exemple des Atikamek et des Montagnais.” Anthropologie et Sociétés 16 (3): 55–76. https://doi.org/10.7202/015233ar.

——. 2001. “The Land Claims Negotiations of the Montagnais, or Innu of the Province of Quebec and the Management of Natural Resources.” In Aboriginal Autonomy and Development in Northern Quebec and Labrador, edited by Colin Scott, 255–273. Vancouver: UBC Press.

——. 2017. “De la prise en charge à l’autonomie gouvernementale pour les Innus: Un projet de société réduit et face à de nouveaux obstacles.” Les Cahiers du CIÉRA 14: 8–32.

Clammer, John, Sylvie Poirier, and Eric Schwimmer, (eds.). 2004. Figured Worlds: Ontological Obstacles in Intercultural Relations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Cleary, Bernard. 1993. “Le long et difficile portage d’une négociation territoriale.” Recherches amérindiennes au Québec 27 (1): 49–60.

Conseil Atikamekw-Montagnais (CAM). 1979. “Nishastanan Nitasinan (Notre terre, nous l’aimons et nous y tenons): Revendications territoriales des bandes attikamèques et montagnaises adressées au Ministre des Affaires indiennes et du Nord, Représentant du gouvernement du Canada.” Recherches amérindiennes au Québec 9 (3): 171–193.

Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw Nehirowisiw (CNA). 1996. Sommet Aski. 3–5 décembre 1996. La Tuque, QC: Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw Nehirowisiw.

——. 1998. Termes de référence en Atikamekw pour la Commission sur la Constitution Atikamekw. La Tuque, QC: Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw Nehirowisiw.

——. 2012. Commission territoriale atikamekw, 29–30 octobre 2012. La Tuque, QC: Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw Nehirowisiw.

——. 2014. Waskamanakotatan kitaskino: Soyons responsagble envers Kitaskino. Colloque sur le territoire. September 28–October 1. Wemotaci, QC: Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw Nehirowisiw.

Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC). 2009. The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement and the Northeastern Quebec Agreement – 2005–2006 and 2006–2007 Annual Report. Accessed 3 April 2018. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/ainc-inac/R71-38-2007-eng.pdf.

Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada (CIRNAC). 2014a. Renewing the Federal Comprehensive Land Claims Policy. Accessed 23 August 2019. https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1408631807053/1544123449934#chp3.

——. 2014b. Evaluation of the Process of Negotiating Comprehensive Land Claims and Self-Government Agreements – Follow-Up Report Status Update as of December 31, 2014. Accessed 9 August 2020. https://www.rcaanc-cirnac.gc.ca/eng/1490193557683/1538051296234.

——. n.d. Fiche d’information – Une approche axée sur les résultats pour la négociation des revendications territoriales globales et de l’autonomie gouvernementale. Accessed 2 November 2016. https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/fra/1406824128903/1406824211834 (site discontinued).

Dandenault, André. 1983. Occupation et utilisation du territoire par les Attikameks de Weymontachie. Rapport communautaire. Village-des-Hurons, QC: Conseil Atikamekw-Montagnais.

Dupuis, Renée. 1993. “Historique de la négociation sur les revendications territoriales du Conseil des Atikamekw et des Montagnais (1978–1992).” Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 23 (1): 35–48.

——. 1997. Tribus, peuples et nations: Les nouveaux enjeux des revendications autochtones au Canada. Montreal: Boréal.

Éthier, Benoit. 2017. Orocowewin notcimik itatcihowin: Ontologie politique et contemporanéité des responsabilités et des droits territoriaux chez les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok (Haute-Mauricie, Québec) dans le contexte des négociations territoriales globales. PhD dissertation, département d’anthropologie, Université Laval.

Éthier, Benoit, and Sylvie Poirier. 2018. “Territorialité et territoires de chasse familiaux chez les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok dans le contexte contemporain.” Anthropologica 60 (1): 106–118. https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.60.1.t11.

Feit, Harvey. 2004. “James Bay Crees’ Life Projects and Politics: Histories of Place, Animal Partners and Enduring Relationships.” In The Way of Development: Indigenous Peoples, Life Projects and Globalization, edited by Mario Blaser, Harvey A. Feit and Glenn McRae, 92–110. London: Zed Books.

Government of Canada. 2019. “Chapter 3: Advancing Reconciliation.” Budget 2019. Accessed 23 August 2019. https://www.budget.gc.ca/2019/docs/plan/chap-03-en.html.

Grammond, Sébastien. 2013. Terms of Coexistence: Indigenous Peoples and Canadian Law. Toronto: Thomson Reuters.

Groupe international de travail pour les peuples autochtones (GIPTA). 2012. Foire aux questions: Une approche axée sur les résultats pour la négociation de traités et de l’autonomie gouvernementale. Accessed 3 April 2018. http://www.gitpa.org/web/AMN%20CANADA%20%20Une%20approche%20axee%20sur%20les%20resultats%20.pdf.

Harris, Cole. 2004. “How Did Colonialism Dispossess? Comments from an Edge of Empire.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (1): 165–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09401009.x.

Houde, Nicolas. 2011. Experimenting with What Will Become Our Traditions: Adaptive Co-Management as a Bridge to an Atikamekw Nehirowisiw Post-Treaty World in Nitaskinan. PhD dissertation, Department of Geography, McGill University.

——. 2014. “La gouvernance territoriale contemporaine du Nitaskinan: Tradition, adaptation et flexibilité.” Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 44 (1): 23–33. https://doi.org/10.7202/1027877ar.

Léger, Yves. 1983. Occupation et utilisation du territoire par les Attikameks d’Obedjiwan. Rapport communautaire. Village-des-Hurons, QC: Conseil Atikamekw-Montagnais.

Nadasdy, Paul. 2012. “Boundaries among Kin: Sovereignty, the Modern Treaty Process, and the Rise of Ethno-Territorial Nationalism among Yukon First Nations.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 54 (3): 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417512000217.

——. 2018. Sovereignty’s Entailments: First Nation State Formation in the Yukon. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Ortner, Sherry. 1995. “Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal.” Society for Comparative Study of Society and History 37 (1): 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500019587.

Pasternak, Shiri. 2017. Grounded Authority: The Algonquins of Barriere Lake against the State. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Poirier, Sylvie. 2000. “Contemporanéité autochtones, territoires et (post)colonialisme: Réflexions sur des exemples canadiens et australiens.” Anthropologie et Sociétés 24 (1): 137–153. https://doi.org/10.7202/015640ar.

——. 2004. “The Atikamekw: Reflections on Their Changing World.” In Native Peoples: The Canadian Experience, edited by Bruce R. Morrison and Roderick Wilson, 129–149. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

——. 2010. “Change, Resistance, Accommodation and Engagement in Indigenous Contexts: A Comparative (Canada-Australia) Perspectives.” Anthropological Forum 20 (1): 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903524202.

——. 2013. “The Dynamic Reproduction of Hunter-Gatherers’ Ontologies and Values.” In Companion to the Anthropology of Religion, edited by Janice Boddy and Michael Lambeck, 50–68. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

——. 2017. “Nehirowisiw Territoriality: Negotiating and Managing Entanglement and Coexistence.” In Entangled Territorialities: Negotiating Indigenous Lands in Canada and Australia, edited by Françoise Dussart and Sylvie Poirier, 212–234. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Poirier, Sylvie, Laurent Jérôme and Société d’histoire Atikamekw Nehirowisiw. 2014. “Présentation. Les Atikamekw Nehirowisiwok: Territorialités et savoirs.” Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 64 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.7202/1027875ar.

Poirier, Sylvie, and Jean-Marc Niquay. 1997–99. Entrevues réalisées dans les communautés de Manawan, d’Opitciwan et de Wemotaci. Traduit et transcrit par Jean-Marc Niquay. La Tuque, QC: Conseil de la Nation Atikamekw.

Povinelli, Elizabeth A. 2002. The Cunning of Recognition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Sahlins, Marshall. 1999. “What Is Anthropological Enlightenment? Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28: i–xxiii. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.0.

Samson, Colin. 1999. “The Dispossession of the Innu and the Colonial Magic of Canadian Liberalism.” Citizenship Studies 3 (1): 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621029908420698.

——. 2016. “Canada’s Strategy of Dispossession: Aboriginal Land and Rights Cessions in Comprehensive Land Claims.” Canadian Journal of Law and Society/Revue Canadienne Droit et Société 31 (1): 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1017/cls.2016.2.

Scott, Colin. 2017. “The Endurance of Relational Ontology: Encounters between Eeyouch and Sport Hunters.” In Entangled Territorialities: Negotiating Indigenous Lands in Canada and Australia, edited by Françoise Dussart and Sylvie Poirier, 51–69. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Sioui, Marie-Michèle. 2014. Des autochtones veulent renégocier la Convention de la Baie-James. La Presse, 13 November. http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/politique/politique-quebecoise/201411/13/01-4818477-des-autochtones-veulent-renegocier-la-convention-de-la-baie-james.php (accessed 5 August 2020).

Sletto, Bjorn. 2009. “‘Indigenous People Don’t Have Boundaries’: Reborderings, Fire Management, and Productions of Authenticities in Indigenous Landscapes.” Cultural Geographies 16 (2): 253–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008101519.

St-Pierre, Caroline. 2014. Convention de la Baie-James: Une coalition pour la défense des titres ancestraux. La Presse, 13 November. http://www.lapresse.ca/actualites/National/201411/13/01-4818686-convention-de-la-baie-james-une-coalition-pour-la-defense-des-titres-ancestraux.php (accessed 5 August 2020).

Studio Mahikan. 2015. “Moteskano.” Accessed 5 August 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Lz6NBo_QPRg&app=desktop.

——. 2016. “Tapiskwan Sipi.” Accessed 5 August 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFyhxR7fr7o.

Thom, Brian. 2009. “The Paradox of Boundaries in Coast Salish Territories.” Cultural Geographies 16 (2): 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008101516.

——. 2014. “Reframing Indigenous Territories: Private Property, Human Rights and Overlapping Claims.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 38 (4): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicr.38.4.6372163053512w6x.

——. 2015. “Confusion sur les territoires autochtones au Canada.” In Terres, territoires, ressources: Politiques, pratiques et droits des peuples autochtones, edited by Irène Bellier, 89–105. Paris: L’Harmattan.

Tully, James. 2016. “Deparochializing Political Theory and Beyond: A Dialogue Approach to Comparative Political Thought.” Journal of World Philosophies 1: 51–74.

Vincent, Sylvie. 2016.“‘Chevauchements’ territoriaux: Ou comment l’ignorance du droit coutumier algonquins permet de créer de faux problèmes.” Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 46 (2–3): 91–103. https://doi.org/10.7202/1040438ar.