Anthropologists Meet the 15M: The Rise of Engaged Ethnography
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.2018-0042Keywords:
social movements, collective action, 15M, ethnography, engaged ethnographyAbstract
In 2011 we were involved as activists in labour, 15M, and the housing and feminist movements. Part of our scientific production became intertwined with our militancy. In addition, drawing on our research and militant experiences in the cycle of struggle that started in 2011, we noticed that the process of questioning and delegitimisation was also affecting the ambit of the social sciences. Thus, we undertook a review of the scientific literature on the 15M in order to ascertain whether the epistemological perspectives and the methodological choices of these studies were related in some way to the crisis of representation that was affecting other social institutions. This is the objective of this article. First, it explains the strategy we followed in searching the literature on the 15M. Second, it introduces the findings of the literature review on this social movement, both in Spanish and in international academic journals. Third, it proposes a typology of engaged ethnographic research. Fourth, it provides a series of limitations and precautions that researchers should bear in mind when putting this research technique into practice. Fifth, it includes a final section synthesising the main conclusions of this article regarding the anthropological production of the 15M, the types of engaged ethnography, and the limitations of this technique.
Downloads
References
American Anthropological Association. 2009. “Code of Ethics of the American Anthropological Association.” http://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-aaa/files/production/public/FileDownloads/pdfs/issues/policy-advocacy/upload/AAA-Ethics-Code-2009.pdf.
Arenas Conejo, Miriam and Asun Pié Balaguer. 2014. “Las comisiones de diversidad funcional en el 15M español: Poner el cuerpo en el espacio público.” Política y Sociedad 51(1): 227–245. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_POSO.2014.v51.n1.42459
Arribas Lozano, Alberto. 2014. “Lógicas emergentes de acción colectiva y prácticas colaborativas de investigación. Apuntes para una Antropología junto y con los movimientos sociales.” Gazeta de Antropología 30(1): artículo 07.
Barranquero, Alejandro and Miriam Meda. 2015. “Los medios comunitarios y alternativos en el ciclo de protestas ciudadanas desde el 15 M.” Athenea Digital 15(1): 139–170. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenea.1385.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2002. Contrafuegos 2. Por un movimiento social europeo. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Castells, Manuel. 2012. Networks of Outrage and Hope. Social Movements in the Internet Age. Chichester: Wiley.
Dean, Jodi. 2009. Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Fluehr-Lobban, Carolyn. 2013. Ethics and Anthropology: Ideas and Practice. Lanham: Altamira Press.
Foley, Douglas E. 1999. “The Fox Project: A Reappraisal.” Current Anthropology 40(2): 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1086/200003
García López, Ernesto. 2013. “Antropología y movimientos sociales: Reflexiones para una etnografía de los nuevos movimientos globales.” Intersticios: Revista Sociológica de Pensamiento Crítico 7(1): 83–113.
Gómez, Lucía and Francisco Jódar. 2013. “Ética y política en la universidad española: La evaluación de la investigación como tecnología de la subjetividad.” Athenea Digital 13(1): 81–98. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/athenead/v13n1.1169.
Greenwood, Davydd J., William Foote Whyte, and Ira Harkavy. 1993. “Participatory Action Research as a Process and as a Goal.” Human Relations 46(2): 175–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679304600203
Holmberg, Allan R. 1955. “Participant Intervention in the Field.” Human Organization 14(1): 23–26. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.14.1.nk7297551616367l
Juris, Jeffrey. 2012. “Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social Media, Public Space, and Emerging Logics of Aggregation.” American Ethnologist 39(2): 259–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012.01362.x
Kalantzis, Konstantinos. 2012. “Crete as Warriorhood: Visual Explorations of Social Imaginaries in ‘Crisis.’ ” Anthropology Today 28(3): 7–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8322.2012.00871.x
Matencio, Nuria and Marta Vilela. 2017. “Dejarlo todo y empezar desde cero: El caso de muchos.” Revista de Dialectología y Tradiciones Populares 72(1): 59–66. https://doi.org/10.3989/rdtp.2017.01.001.07.
Ortner, Sherry. 2016. “Dark Anthropology and Its Others. Theory since the Eighties.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6(1): 47–73. https://doi.org/10.14318/hau6.1.004.
Parellada, Martí. 2014. Informe CyD 2014. Barcelona: Fundación CyD.
Razsa, Maple, and Andrej Kurnik. 2012. “The Occupy Movement in Žižek’s Hometown: Direct Democracy and the Politics of Becoming.” American Ethnologist 39(2): 238–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2012 .01361.x.
Roca, Beltran, and Iban Díaz-Parra. 2017. “Blurring the Borders between Old and New Social Movements: The M15 Movement and the Radical Unions in Spain.” Mediterranean Politics 22(2): 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2016.1151138.
Roca, Beltran, and Emma Martín-Diaz. 2017. “Solidarity Networks of Spanish Migrants in the UK and Germany: The Emergence of Interstitial Trade Unionism.” Critical Sociology 43(7–8): 1197–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516645659
Romanos, Eduardo. 2011. “Emociones, identidad y represión: El activismo anarquista durante el franquismo.” Revista Española de Sociología 134: 87–106.
Romanos, Eduardo and Igor Sádaba. 2015. “La evolución de los marcos (tecno) discursivos del movimiento 15M y sus consecuencias.” Empiria 32: 15–36. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.32.2015.15307
———. 2016. “From the Street to Institutions through the App: Digitally Enabled Political Outcomes of the Spanish Indignados Movement.” Revista Internacional de Sociología 74(4): e048. https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.4.048.
Shukaitis, Stevphen, David Graeber, and Erika Biddle (eds.). 2007. Constituent Imagination: Militant Investigations, Collective Theorization. Oakland: AK Press.
Standing, Guy. 2011. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Sutton, Bárbara. 2007. “Poner el Cuerpo: Women’s Embodiment and Political Resistance in Argentina.” Latin American Politics and Society 49(3): 129–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2007.tb00385.x.
Tarrow, Sydney. 1994. Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tax, Sol. 1958. “The Fox Project.” Human Organization 17(1): 17–19. https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.17.1 .b1gtr520r323687t.
Theodossopoulos, Dimitrios. 2016. “Philanthropy or Solidarity? Ethical Dilemmas about Humanitarianism in Crisis-Afflicted Greece.” Social Anthropology 24(2): 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12304.
Valles, Raul. 2002. Entrevistas cualitativas. Madrid: CSIC.
Velasco, Honorio and Ángel Díaz de Rada. 2009. La lógica de la investigación etnográfica. Madrid: Trotta.
Žižek, Slavoj. 2007. “Resistance Is Surrender.” London Review of Books 29(2): 7.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors contributing to Anthropologica agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
