The Anti-Politics of TEK: The Institutionalization of Co-Management Discourse and Practice

Authors

  • Paul Nadasdy University of Wisconsin, Madison

Keywords:

co-management, traditional ecological knowledge, bureaucratization, power, development, First Nations, Yukon

Abstract

Co-operative resource management holds out the promise of positive social change on two fronts: improved management and the empowerment of local communities. The institutionalization of co-management discourse and practice, how ever, has unintended political consequences analogous to those identified by recent critics of development discourse. As a result, co-management may actually be preventing rather than fostering the kind of change proponents desire. In this paper, I examine the discourse and practice of co-management and how they constrain the ways people can act—and even think—about wildlife management. I focus on the case of the Ruby Range Sheep Steering Committee, a co-management body established to address concerns about a population of Dall Sheep in the southwest Yukon.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
4%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Canadian Anthropology Society
Publisher 
University of Victoria

Downloads

Published

2022-06-22

How to Cite

Nadasdy, P. (2022). The Anti-Politics of TEK: The Institutionalization of Co-Management Discourse and Practice. Anthropologica, 47(2), 215–232. Retrieved from https://cas-sca.journals.uvic.ca/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/2384