Histories of Conviviality in a Northeast Brazilian Periferia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica64220221488Keywords:
conviviality, inter-household sociality, peripheral communities, Brazil, rural-urban migrationAbstract
This article critically discusses conviviality by identifying commonly conflated understandings of the concept including emic, etic, normative, and historically contingent discourses. I argue that conviviality can most usefully be understood as a particular mode of sociality, and as such is necessarily shaped by prior modes of sociality and their attendant values. Conviviality is then applied analytically to participant observation conducted in an urban peripheral community in Northeastern Brazil. I argue that, in this community, residents approached living together through the distinctive Nordestino values of self-reliance and dignity, which produced a mode of sociality anthropologists have characterized as “inter-household autonomy.” I also describe shifts in the experience of conviviality between the beginning of my fieldwork in 1998 and 2015, and thus demonstrate how modes of sociality are themselves historically contingent.
Downloads
Publication Facts
Reviewer profiles N/A
Author statements
- Editor & editorial board
- profiles
- Academic society
- Canadian Anthropology Society
- Publisher
- University of Victoria
To learn about these publication facts, click 
PF is maintained by the Public Knowledge Project
References
Ansell, Aaron. 2014. Zero Hunger: Political Culture and Anti Poverty Policy in Northeast Brazil. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Boisvert, Raymond. 2010. “Convivialism: A Philosophical Manifesto.” The Pluralist 5(2): 57–68. https://doi.org/10.5406/pluralist.5.2.0057
De Mata, Roberto. 1985. A Casa & A Rua: Espaço, cidadania, mulher e morte do Brasil. [The House and the Street: Space, citizenship, women and death in Brazil]. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco.
Duru, Deniz. 2016. “Memory, Conviviality, and Coexistence: Negotiating Class Differences in Burgaszadasi, Istanbul.” In Space and Place, Post-Ottoman Coexistence: Sharing Space in the Shadow of Conflict, edited by Rebecca Bryant, 157–179. Brooklyn, NY: Berghahn Books.
Erikson, Brad. 2011. “Utopian virtues: Muslim neighbors, ritual sociality, and the politics of convivència.” American Ethnologist 38 (1): 114–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01296.x
Forman, Shepard. 1970. The Raft Fisherman: Tradition and change in the Brazilian peasant economy. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fincher, Ruth, Kurt Iveson, Helga Leitner and Valerie Preston. 2014. “Planning in the multicultural city: Celebrating diversity or reinforcing difference?” Progress in Planning 92: 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2013.04.001
Freitag, Ulrike. 2014. “Cosmopolitanism and Conviviality? Some conceptual considerations concerning the late Ottoman Empire.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17(4): 375–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510417
Harris, Marvin. 1956. Town and Country in Brazil. New York: Columbia University Press.
Heil, Tilmann. 2014. “Are Neighbours Alike? Practices of Conviviality in Catalonia and Casamance.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17(4): 452–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510420
IBGE. 2011. Barrios de Fortaleza. https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados/ce/fortaleza. html (accessed 10 April 2022).
Goldstein, Donna M. 2003. Laughter out of Place: Race, Class, Violence, and Sexuality in a Rio Shantytown. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Jerome Scott, Jessica. 2015. A Right to Health: Medicine, Marginality and Health Care Reform in Northeastern Brazil. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
———. 2016. “Fraternity, Dignity, and Democracy: Forms of Value in Northeast Brazil’s Health Care Reform Movement.” Tipití: Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 14(2):164–177. https://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol14/iss2/3
———. 2021. “Among Mothers and Daughters: Economic Mobility and Political Identity in a Northeastern Periferia.” In Precarious Democracy: Ethnographies of Hope, Despair, and Resistance in Brazil, edited by Benjamin Junge, Sean T. Michell, Alvaro Jarrín, and Lucia Cantero, 38-49. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press.
Johnson, Allen. 1971. Sharecroppers of the Sertão: Economics and Dependence on a Brazilian Plantation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Lapina, Linda. 2016. “Paradoxes in being ‘at ease’ with diversity in a Copenhagen district.” Nordic Journal of Migration Research 6(1): 33–41. http://doi.org/10.1515/njmr-2016-0002
Lomintz, Claudia. 1977. Networks and Marginality: Life in a Mexican Shantytown. London: SPCK Publishing.
Martins Dias, Gentil. 1978. “New Patterns of Domination in Rural Brazil: A Case Study of Agriculture in the Brazilian Northeast.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.1086/451079
Morwaska, E. 2014. “Composite meaning, flexible ranges, and multi-level conditions of conviviality: Exploring the polymorph.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (4): 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510418
Neal, Sarah, Katy Bennett, Allan Cochrane and Giles Mohan. 2019. “Community and Conviviality? Informal Social Life in Multicultural Places.” Sociology 53 (1): 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038518763518
Nowicka, Magdalena and Steven Vertovec. 2014. “Comparing convivialities: Dreams and realities of living-with-difference.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (4): 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510414
Perlman, Janice. 2011. Favela: Four Decades of Living on the Edge in Rio de Janeiro. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierson, Donald. 1948. Cruz das Almas, a Brazilian village. Washington: U.S. Government Office.
Radice, Martha. 2016. “Unpacking Intercultural Conviviality in Multiethnic Commercial Streets.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1211624
Rebhun, Linda-Anne. 1999. The Heart Is Unknown Country: Love in the Changing Economy of Northeast Brazil. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
Ross, Marc Howard and Thomas S. Weisner. 1977. “The Rural-Urban migrant network in Kenya: some general implications.” American Ethnologist 4(2): 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1525/ae.1977.4.2.02a00090
Sahlins, Marshall. 1978. Culture and Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Santos, Martha. 2011. Cleansing Honor with Blood: Masculinity, Violence, and Power in the Backlands of Northeast Brazil, 1845-1889. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1992. Death Without Weeping: The Violence of Everyday Life in Brazil. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Simic, Andrei. 1970. The Peasant Urbanites: A Study of Urban Mobility in Serbia. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
Wessendorf, Susanne. 2014. “Being open, but sometimes closed: Conviviality in a superdiverse London neighbourhood.” European Journal of Cultural Studies (17)4: 392–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549413510415
Wise, Amanda and Greg Noble. 2016. “Convivialities: An Orientation.” Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (5): 423–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1213786
Vertontec, Steven. 2007. “Super-diversity and its implications.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 30(6): 1024–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870701599465
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jessica Jerome
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to Anthropologica agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 Unported license. This licence allows anyone to share their work (copy, distribute, transmit) and to adapt it for non-commercial purposes provided that appropriate attribution is given, and that in the event of reuse or distribution, the terms of this license are made clear.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
