Talking and Acting A Pandemic Ethnography of COVID-19 in Montmartre

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120231065

Keywords:

COVID-19, human futures, sense-making, linguistic anthropology, medical anthropology

Abstract

Informed by eighteen months of ethnographic fieldwork in Montmartre, one of the last village-like neighbourhoods in Paris, in this paper, I analyze how people in this community talked through and acted out the COVID-19 pandemic. Using theoretical frameworks from linguistic, cognitive and medical anthropology, I examine “small stories” (Georgakopoulou 2007) about COVID-19, in particular, the analogical and conceptual aspects of this talk. How do people construct understandings of crisis as it evolves? What does this process look like when talk becomes action and reaction and what does it say about the future?

This paper explores how people employed analogy, cultural scripts and other linguistic wor(l)d-building tools in their talk about their experiences and comprehensions of COVID-19. Following the arguments of Ochs (2012), I propose that talking about COVID-19 is itself an experience of the virus, an experience that informs people’s understandings of their present circumstances and future possibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Black, Steven P. 2021a. “Portable Values, Inequities, and Techno-Optimism in Global Health Storytelling.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 31 (1): 25–42. https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.12297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12297

——. 2021b. “Linguistic Anthropology and COVID-19.” Anthropology News website, 26 March. Accessed 6 August 2021. https://www.anthropology-news.org/articles/linguistic-anthropology-and-covid-19/.

Blommaert, Jan. 2020. “The coronavirus crisis of 2020 and Globalization.” Diggit Magazine, 3 December. Accessed 6 August 2021. https://www.diggitmagazine.com/column/coronavirus-globalization.

Briggs, Charles L. 2002. “Why Nation States and Journalists Can’t Teach People to Be Healthy.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 17 (3): 287–321. https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2003.17.3.287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/maq.2003.17.3.287

Davies, Christie. 1982. “Sexual Taboos and Social Boundaries.” American Journal of Sociology 87 (5): 1032–1063. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/227554

Douglas, Mary. 2002 (1966). Purity and Danger. New York: Routledge Classics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203361832

Foucault, Michel. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2007. Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sin.8

Good, Byron. 1994. Medicine, Rationality and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hariman, Robert. 2016. “Public Culture.” Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Accessed 27 November 2022. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-32.

Hofstadter, Douglas and Emmanuel Sander. 2010. Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books.

Inhorn, Marcia C. and Peter J. Brown. 1990. “The Anthropology of Infectious Disease.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19: 89–117. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000513

Lambert, Anne and Joanie Cayouette-Remblière, eds. 2021. L’explosion des inégalités : Classes, genre et générations face à la crise sanitaire. Paris: Éditions de l’Aube.

Lee, Gregory B. 2013. “Migration et diaspora chinoises : La Chine et les chinois dans l’imaginaire des français.” Huaqiao: Regards sur les présences chinoises à Valence, Centre du patrimoine arménien, Valence, March, Valence, France. Accessed 14 August 2021. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-02070372/.

Longhi, J. 2022. “The Parascientific Communication around Didier Raoult’s Expertise and the Debates in the Media and on Digital Social Networks during the COVID-19 Crisis in France.” Publications 10 (7): 1–16. https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/10/1/7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/publications10010007

Masquelier, Bertrand. 1993. “Parler de la maladie. Querelles et langage chez les Ide du Cameroun.” Journal des Africanistes 63: 21–33. https://www.persee.fr/doc/jafr_0399-0346_1993_num_63_1_2370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/jafr.1993.2370

Mattingly, Cheryl and Linda G. Garro, eds. 2001. Narrative and the Cultural Construction of Illness and Healing. Berkley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520218246.001.0001

Ochs, Elinor. 2012. “Experiencing language.” Anthropological Theory 12 (2): 142–160. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1463499612454088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499612454088

Roitman, Janet. 2021. “Crisis.” Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon. Accessed 20 June 2022. https://www.politicalconcepts.org/roitman-crisis/#fn81.

Singer, Merrill. 2014. Anthropology of Infectious Disease. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.

Sontag, Susan. 2002 (1979 and 1989). Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and Its Metaphors. New York: Penguin Classics.

Wang, Simeng. 2020. “Compte rendu : Mission d’information sur l’émergence et l’évolution des différentes formes de racisme et les réponses à y apporter.” Assemblée Nationale, 7 July, Compte Rendu 5. Accessed 14 August 2021. https://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/dyn/opendata/CRCANR5L15S2020PO768631N005.html.

Wiercinski, Andrew. 2013. “Hermeneutic Notion of a Human Being as an Acting and Suffering Person: Thinking with Paul Ricoeur.” Ethics in Progress 4 (2): 18–33. https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2013.2.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2013.2.2

Downloads

Published

2023-09-28

How to Cite

Black, A. (2023). Talking and Acting A Pandemic Ethnography of COVID-19 in Montmartre. Anthropologica, 65(1). https://doi.org/10.18357/anthropologica65120231065

Issue

Section

Late-Breaking Thematic Section: Giving Shape to COVID-19 through Anthropological Lenses. Round Two. COVID-19 Pandemica: (Anti) Sociality and the Longevity Question