Addressing the Challenge of Overlapping Claims in Implementing the Vancouver Island (Douglas) Treaties

  • Brian Thom Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Keywords: Indigenous territory, Douglas Treaties, modern-day treaty negotiations, Indigenous laws, hunting rights

Abstract

Indigenous social and legal orders are a source for addressing the challenge of overlapping claims in exercising historic treaty rights in the territories of neighbouring non-treaty Indigenous Peoples. The Vancouver Island Treaties (also known as the Douglas Treaties) of the 1850s made commitments that signatory communities could continue to hunt on unoccupied lands and carry on their fisheries as formerly. Today, as urban, agricultural and industrial forestry have constrained where people can exercise their treaty rights locally, individuals from these nations exercise harvesting rights in “extended territories” of their neighbours. Through detailing several court cases where these treaty rights were challenged by the Crown and the texts of modern-day treaty documents, I show how Coast Salish people continue to draw on local values and legal principles to articulate their distinctive vision of territory and community, both engaging and subverting divisive “overlapping claims” discourses. Not only First Nations but the state, through the judiciary, Crown counsel and land claims negotiators, also, at times, acknowledge and recognise the principles of kin and land tenure that are the foundation for addressing the challenges of overlapping claims.

References

Barsh, Russel. 2008. “Ethnogenesis and Ethnonationalism from Competing Treaty Claims.” In The Power of Promises: Rethinking Indian Treaties in the Pacific Northwest, edited by Alexandra Harmon, 215–243. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

R v Bartleman, [1984] CanLII 547 (BCCA). Accessed 26 September 2018. http://canlii.ca/t/22whw.

Boas, Franz. 1887. “Zur Ethnologie Britisch-Kolumbiens.” Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 33 (5): 129–133.

——. 1890. “First General Report on the Indians of British Columbia.” In Report of the Fifty Ninth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 801–855. London: British Association for the Advancement of Science.

Claxton, Nicholas XEMT-OLTW. 2015. To Fish as Formerly: A Resurgent Journey Back to the Saanich Reef Net Fishery. PhD dissertation, Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Victoria. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/6614.

Cook v Minister of Aboriginal Relations and Reconciliation, [2007] BCSC 1722, Accessed 3 February 2019. http://canlii.ca/t/1tzsj9.

Duff, Wilson. 1969. “The Fort Victoria Treaties.” BC Studies 3: 3–57. https://doi.org/10.14288/bcs.v0i3.607.

Foster, Hamar. 1989. “The Saanichton Bay Marina Case: Imperial Law, Colonial History and Competing Theories of Aboriginal Title.” UBC Law Review 23: 629–650.

Fritz, Justin. 2017. The SWELSWÁLET of the WSÁNEĆ Nation: Narratives of a ‘Nation (Re)Building Process.’ MA thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca//handle/1828/8842.

Frogner, Raymond. 2010. “‘Innocent Legal Fictions’: Archival Convention and the North Saanich Treaty of 1852.” Archivaria 70: 45–94. https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/13295.

Hill-Tout, Charles. 1904. “Ethnological Report on the Stseélis and Skaúlits Tribes of the Halkomélem Division of the Salish of British Columbia.” Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland 34: 311–376. https://doi.org/10.2307/2843105.

HTG Case Study. n.d. Mapping Contemporary Challenges to Island Hul'qumi'num Peoples’ Territories. Accessed 21 July 2020. https://sites.google.com/view/htgcasestudy/.

Kennedy, Dorothy. 2007. “Quantifying ‘Two Sides of a Coin’: A Statistical Examination of the Central Coast Salish Social Network.” BC Studies 153: 3–34. https://doi.org/10.14288/bcs.v0i153.657.

Komoyue Heritage Society v British Columbia (AG), [2006] BCSC 1517, Accessed 3 February 2019. http://canlii.ca/t/1ps4m.

Lane, Barbara. 1953. A Comparative and Analytical Study of Some Aspects of Northwest Coast Religion. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington.

Miller, Bruce. 2014. “An Ethnographic View of Legal Entanglements on the Salish Sea Borderlands.” UBC Law Review 43 (3): 991–1023.

——. 2016. The Contemporary Coast Salish: Essays by Bruce Granville Miller. edited by Bruce Miller and Darby Stapp. Memoir 12. Richland, WA: Journal of Northwest Anthropology.

Mooney, Kathleen. 1976. “Social Distance and Exchange: The Coast Salish Case.” Ethnology 15 (4): 323–346. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773303.

——. 1978. “The Effects of Rank and Wealth on Exchange among the Coast Salish.” Ethnology 17 (4): 391–406. https://doi.org/10.2307/3773190.

——. 1988. “Suburban Coast Salish Inter-Household Co-operation, Economics and Religious Movements.” Culture 8 (1): 49–59.

Morales, Sarah, and Brian Thom. 2020. “The Principle of Sharing and the Shadow of Canadian Property Law.” In Creating Indigenous Property: Power, Rights, and Relationships, edited by Angela Cameron, Sari Graben and Val Napoleon, 120–162. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

R v Morris et al., [2010] BCPC 270. Accessed 3 February 2019. http://canlii.ca/t/2df6z.

Nadasdy, Paul. 2012. “Boundaries among Kin: Sovereignty, the Modern Treaty Process, and the Rise of Ethno-Territorial Nationalism among Yukon First Nations.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 54 (3): 499–532. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417512000217.

Quirk, Dominique. 2015. Addressing Overlapping Land Claim Conflict: An (Alter)Native Approach. Master’s thesis, Faculté de droit, Université de Montréal.

Rozen, David. 1985. Place-Names of the Island Halkomelem Indian People. Master’s thesis, Department of Anthropology and Sociology, University of British Columbia. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/25517.

Suttles, Wayne. 1951. The Economic Life of the Coast Salish of Haro and Rosario Straits. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.

——. 1955. Katzie Ethnographic Notes. Victoria: British Columbia Provincial Museum.

——. 1960. “Affinal Ties, Subsistence, and Prestige among the Coast Salish.” American Anthropologist 62 (3): 296–305. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1960.62.2.02a00080.

——. 1963. “Persistence of Intervillage Ties among the Coast Salish.” Ethnology 2 (4): 512–525. https://doi.org/10.2307/3772960.

——. 1990a. “Central Coast Salish.” In Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 7, Northwest Coast, edited by Wayne Suttles, 453–475. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.

——. 1990b. “Central Coast Salish Subsistence.” Northwest Anthropological Research Notes 24 (2): 147–152.

Te’mexw Treaty Association, Canada, and British Columbia. 2015. “Te’mexw Treaty Association Agreement-in-Principle.” Accessed 3 February 2019. http://www.bctreaty.ca/sites/default/files/Temexw_AIP.pdf.

Thom, Brian. 2005. Coast Salish Senses of Place: Dwelling, Meaning, Power, Property and Territory in the Coast Salish World. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, McGill University. https://escholarship.mcgill.ca/concern/theses/vm40xs07v.

——. 2009. “The Paradox of Boundaries in Coast Salish Territories.” Cultural Geographies 16 (2): 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474008101516.

——. 2010. “The Anathema of Aggregation: Towards 21st Century Self-Government in the Coast Salish World.” Anthropologica 52 (1): 33–48. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29545993.

——. 2014. “Reframing Indigenous Territories: Private Property, Human Rights and Overlapping Claims.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 38 (4): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicr.38.4.6372163053512w6x.

——. 2020. “Encountering Indigenous Law in Canada.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Anthropologyt, edited by Marie-Claire Foblets, Mark Goodale, Maria Sapignoli and Olaf Zenker. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thom, Brian, and Kathleen Johnnie. Forthcoming. “Implementing Contemporary Indigenous Territories: Mapping the Aspirations and Challenges of Island Hul’qumi’num Peoples.” In Indigenous Stewardship of Environment and Alternative Development, edited by Evodia Silva-Rivera, Katie Sinclair and Colin Scott. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia, [2014] 2 SCR 257, 2014 SCC 44. Accessed 3 February 2019. http://canlii.ca/t/g7mt9.

Turner, Christopher, and Gail Fondahl. 2015. “‘Overlapping Claims’ to Territory Confronting Treaty-Making in British Columbia: Causes and Implications.” Canadian Geographer 59 (4): 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12205.

Vallance, Neil. 2015. Sharing the Land: The Formation of the Vancouver Island (or ‘Douglas’) Treaties of 1850–1854 in Historical, Legal and Comparative Context. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Law, University of Victoria. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/7089.

Verspoor, Frederike. 2012. The Fort Victoria and Other Vancouver Island Treaties, 1850–1854. BC Archives MS-0772. Accessed 23 July 2020. https://royalbcmuseum.bc.ca/assets/FortVictoriaTreaties.pdf.

Published
2020-12-24
How to Cite
Thom, B. (2020). Addressing the Challenge of Overlapping Claims in Implementing the Vancouver Island (Douglas) Treaties. Anthropologica, 62(2), 295-307. https://doi.org/10.3138/anth-2020-0014
Section
Thematic Section: Treaties: Living Together with the Land