Caribou Hunters and Researchers at the Co-management Interface: Emergent Dilemmas and the Dynamics of Legitimacy in Power Sharing

Authors

  • Gary P. Kofinas University of Alaska, Fairbanks

Keywords:

co-management, Porcupine Caribou, indigenous hunters, legitimacy, traditional knowledge, Arctic Refuge oil development, northern wildlife research

Abstract

A crisis involving indigenous knowledge, caribou science and proposed oil development illustrates the dynamics of legitimacy in formal co-management. Co-management, while typically framed as an institution for power sharing, was also a force of change that affected the values and actions of those involved. Crisis conditions led hunters to express dissatisfaction to their co-management board, forcing board members to work towards regional consensus, which in turn led to a change in community perspectives. Co-management decision makers with multiple affiliations faced difficult dilemmas while seeking to maintain cultural traditions, protect sensitive wildlife habitat, and manage for the legitimacy of their co-management process.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
No
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
4%
33%
Days to publication 
0
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
Canadian Anthropology Society
Publisher 
University of Victoria

Downloads

Published

2022-06-22

How to Cite

Kofinas, G. P. (2022). Caribou Hunters and Researchers at the Co-management Interface: Emergent Dilemmas and the Dynamics of Legitimacy in Power Sharing. Anthropologica, 47(2), 179–196. Retrieved from https://cas-sca.journals.uvic.ca/index.php/anthropologica/article/view/2382