No Sugar, Please! Tobacco Anthropology and the Merits of Contingent Conceptualisation

Martin Holbraad

doi:10.3138/anth.61.1.02

Authors

Martin Holbraad Department of Anthropology, University College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/anth.61.1.02

Keywords:

Fernando Ortiz, counterpoint, ontological turn, conceptualisation, contingency, morphology

Abstract

Deploying Fernando Ortiz’s ethnological contrast, in Cuban Counterpoint, between the generality of sugar and the particularity of tobacco, this article argues that the practice of anthropology is best compared to the latter. Anthropology’s constitutive investment in the particulars of ethnography renders it a “science of the contingent” par excellence, inherently averse to necessities and generalisations of all types. With reference to the recent literature on the “ontological turn” in anthropology, I argue that this investment consists above all in the attempt to turn contingent ethnographic materials into equally contingent conceptualisations. Such a procedure, however, is not contrapuntal in its nature. This is because the relationship between ethnography and its conceptualisation is not symmetrical on the horizontal axis in the way counterpoint is. Unlike counterpoint, therefore, it is the basic difference in kind between ethnographic realities and the concepts they generate that makes their relationship in the process of anthropological analysis interesting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boyer, Pascal. 2002. Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought. New York: Basic Books.

Coronil, Fernando. 1995. Introduction to Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar, by Fernando Ortiz, i–lvi. Translated by Harriet de Onís. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Douglas, Mary. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge.

Espirito Santo, Diana, and Anastasios Panagiotopoulos. 2019. “Afro-Cuban Counterpoint: Religious and Political Encompassments.” Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology. Online first at https://anthrosource.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jlca.12388.

Geertz, Clifford, 1973a. “Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, 412–454. New York: Basic Books.

———. 1973b. “Person, Time and Conduct in Bali.” In The Interpretation of Cultures, 360–411. New York: Basic Books.

Holbraad, Martin. 2017. “The Contingency of Concepts: Transcendental Deduction and Ethnographic Expression in Anthropological Thinking.” In Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology After Anthropology, ed. Pierre Charbonnier, Gildas Salmon, and Peter Skafish, 133–158. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Holbraad, Martin, and Morten Axel Pedersen. 2017. The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1983. The Raw and the Cooked: Mythologiques, vol. 1. Translated by John and Doreen Weightman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mauss, Marcel. 1996. The Gift: Form and Function of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Translated by Ian Cunnison. London: Cohen & West.

Mintz, Sidney. 1986. Sweetness and Power: The Place of Sugar in Modern History. London: Penguin Books.

Moreno Fraginals, Manuel. 1976. The Sugarmill: The Socioeconomic Complex of Sugar in Cuba – 1760–1860. Translated by Cedric Belfrage. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.

Ortiz, Fernando. 1995 [1940]. Cuban Counterpoint: Tobacco and Sugar. Translated by Harriet de Onís. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.